ENTtoday
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
    • eNewsletters
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

New Excise Tax Applicable to Otolaryngologist Devices

by Amy Eckner • November 1, 2012

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

Health care for all is a goal on which politicians, medical professionals and patients can agree. However, the devil is in the details, and one of those details is how to pay for this expanded care.

You might also like:

  • When Dealing with Insurers, Electronic Payment Tools May be an Otolaryngologist’s Best Friend
  • Mobile Devices in the Medical Setting Can Lead to Distracted Doctors and Medical Error
  • How Will the Affordable Care Act Impact Otolaryngology?
  • The Otolaryngologist and the Imminent Crisis in Geriatric Medicine
Explore this issue:
November 2012

One provision in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is a new excise tax on medical device sales. At first glance, this provision is certainly a good source of revenue—it is estimated that the new tax will raise $20 billion by 2019. But the ripples from its impact on medical devices could have unforeseen and far-reaching consequences, not only for manufacturers and importers but also for individual clinical practices.

A New Excise Tax

The new tax, described in Section 9009 of the ACA, applies to businesses that manufacture or import medical devices. The tax goes into effect on January 1, 2013, but is retroactive to any sales made after December 31, 2008. The tax is on total sales rather than profits. (Resellers are not affected.) Because it’s considered an excise tax by the Internal Revenue Service, it isn’t paid for directly by the consumer, although the cost of an excise tax is often added to the product when it’s sold.

Not every medical device is considered taxable. According to the ACA, devices are exempt from the tax if they have been classified as Class II devices under section 513 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360c) and are primarily sold to consumers at retail for not more than $100 per unit, or if they have been classified as Class I devices.

This means that many of the devices used in otolaryngology practice may be taxed, although there are some devices, such as bone conduction hearing aids, that are exempt because of their cost (more than $100) to the consumer.

Device manufacturers will report income according to a sliding scale based on the company’s annual gross receipts of device sales:

  • Manufacturers with not more than $5,000,000 in annual sales: 0 percent;
  • Manufacturers with more than $5,000,000 but less than $25,000,000 in annual sales: 50 percent; and
  • Manufacturers with more than $25,000,000 in annual sales: 100 percent.

Clinician Connection

Because this new tax is collected and paid by device manufacturers, it might seem as though it won’t have a big impact on otolaryngologists. According to the Medical Device Manufacturers Association, however, there could be consequences for clinicians. “The way that the act is structured means that it taxes revenue, not profit,” said Brendan Benner, the organization’s vice president of public affairs. “Innovative companies will seek to lower costs, which usually means stopping some research and cutting staff.”

Pages: 1 2 Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy, Practice Management, Tech Talk Tagged With: affordable care act, billing and coding, ENT medical device, healthcare reform, policy, tax, technologyIssue: November 2012

You might also like:

  • When Dealing with Insurers, Electronic Payment Tools May be an Otolaryngologist’s Best Friend
  • Mobile Devices in the Medical Setting Can Lead to Distracted Doctors and Medical Error
  • How Will the Affordable Care Act Impact Otolaryngology?
  • The Otolaryngologist and the Imminent Crisis in Geriatric Medicine

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Meeting Posters

View posters from Triological Society’s Meetings at TrioMeetingPosters.org

Top Articles for Residents

  • Ethical Implications of Burnout in Otolaryngology Residents
  • How Physicians Can Plan for Maternity Leave
  • Would Physicians Perform Better if They Didn’t Have to Memorize?
  • Leadership Position, Training Can Change Way Otolaryngologists Practice Medicine
  • Sleep Fellowship Training Programs on the Rise
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Eustachian Tuboplasty: A Potential New Option for Chronic Tube Dysfunction and Patulous Disease
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Ménière’s Disease-Don’t Blame the Patient
    • Eustachian Tuboplasty: A Potential New Option for Chronic Tube Dysfunction and Patulous Disease
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Post-Operative Pain in Children Undergoing Tonsillectomy
    • Sleep Disorders Affect Men and Women Differently
    • Drug Shrinks Multiple Cancer Tumor Types with Same Genetic Defect
    • Report: Physician Prescribing Behavior Changes Following Restrictions on Direct Marketing
    • Experts Discuss Approaches to Aging Cases
    • Otolaryngology Community Comes Together for Education and Collaboration

Polls

Is direct-to-consumer genetic testing a good idea?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Triological Meeting Posters

Wiley
© 2017 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.