• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

A 1,540 nm Wavelength Optimal for Laser-Assisted Cartilage Reshaping for Protruding Ears

by Amy Hamaker • September 8, 2015

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

How effective is clinical use of laser-assisted cartilage reshaping (LACR) for protruding ears?

Background: Protruding ears are the most common congenital ear deformity, with a frequency of 13.5% and a well-known hereditary component. Thermal-based mechanisms, such as radiofrequency, electrical current, or lasers, have been investigated to provide cartilage reshaping in place of traditional surgery. In 2006, the first clinical use of LACR for protruding ears was reported.

You Might Also Like

  • Carbon Dioxide Laser-Assisted Cartilage Reshaping Otoplasty
  • KTP and CO2 Laser Fiber Stapedotomy Compared
  • Laser vs. Manual Penetration of Stapes Footplate
  • COSM 2012: Laser Expert Reviews Mechanics Behind Tissue Damage
Explore This Issue
September 2015

Study design: Review of seven clinical LACR studies using three different wavelengths, published between 1993 and 2014.

Setting: MEDLINE database.

Synopsis: Three different wavelengths were used: 1,064 nm, 1,540 nm, and 10,600 nm (CO2). Cumulative fluence ranged from 70 J/cm2 to 84 J/cm2. Except in one study in which eight burn events occurred, there were no intraoperative complications. Post-operative complications included mostly dermatitis, asymmetry, and recurrence. In one study using 1,540 nm, incomplete reshaping was observed in three patients and could be correlated to a lower fluence than usual. The studies using 1,540 nm show that this wavelength is ideal for cartilage reshaping due to the wavelength’s penetration depth matching the thickness of the cartilage and contact cooling making the treatment very tolerable. The 1,540-nm absorption produces less injury to surrounding tissue compared to 1,064 nm, at which the skin was burned in more than 50% of the cases.

A third approach, performing ablation to a partial thickness of the medial surface of the antihelixes using the CO2 laser, permitted cartilage reshaping with both vaporization and incisions for a more precise laser application and cartilage suture, providing greater stabilization, but it is a more complicated technique.

Bottom line: The success rate for ear reshaping achieved with LACR appears promising, particularly at a wavelength of 1,540 nm.

Citation: Leclère FM, Vogt PM, Casoli V, Vlachos S, Mordon S. Laser-assisted cartilage reshaping for protruding ears: a review of the clinical applications Laryngoscope. 2015;125:2067–2071.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology Tagged With: laser-assisted cartilage reshaping, optimal, protuding ears, treatment, wavelengthIssue: September 2015

You Might Also Like:

  • Carbon Dioxide Laser-Assisted Cartilage Reshaping Otoplasty
  • KTP and CO2 Laser Fiber Stapedotomy Compared
  • Laser vs. Manual Penetration of Stapes Footplate
  • COSM 2012: Laser Expert Reviews Mechanics Behind Tissue Damage

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists as Entrepreneurs: Transforming Patient Care And Practice

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Continued Discussion And Engagement Are Essential To How Otolaryngologists Are Championing DEI Initiatives In Medicine

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939