• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube—A Pooled Analysis in Pediatric Patients

by Pinky Sharma • May 4, 2026

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Clinical Question

Is balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube (BDET) safe and effective for children with chronic otitis media with effusion (COME) or recurrent acute otitis media (RAOM) refractory to prior tympanostomy tube placement?

You Might Also Like

  • Balloon Dilation Is Among the New Frontier of Eustachian Tube Care
  • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
  • Eustachian Tuboplasty: A Potential New Option for Chronic Tube Dysfunction and Patulous Disease
  • Balloon Sinuplasty Use Continues to Evolve: Procedure may complement traditional sinus surgery
Explore This Issue
May 2026

Bottom Line

In this multi-institutional pooled analysis of 219 pediatric patients (425 ears), BDET demonstrated a favorable safety profile, significant improvement in tympanograms in over 80% of ears, and durable failure-free survival exceeding 87% at two years.

Background: Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) in children contributes to COME and RAOM, which are often managed with tympanostomy tubes (TTs). While TTs provide temporary ventilation, they do not address underlying Eustachian tube pathology, and recurrence after extrusion is common. Pediatric data on BDET remain limited, prompting pooled analysis to better define safety and durability.

Study Design: Retrospective pooled analysis of patient-level data from seven surgeons across six institutions. Children aged one to 17 years with COME or RAOM refractory to prior TT placement underwent BDET using 6×16 mm balloons. Outcomes included tympanogram changes, failure-free survival (absence of additional surgical intervention), and complications.

Setting: Seven surgeons across six surgical centers contributing retrospective real-world clinical data.

Synopsis: A total of 219 pediatric patients (425 ears) were included in the study, and the mean age was 11 years, while the mean follow-up was 3.4 years. Chronic otitis media with effusion accounted for 56% of cases, and RAOM for 44%. Pre- and post-tympanograms were available for 125 ears (29%). Overall, tympanograms improved in 83.7% of ears, with type B tracings markedly reduced post-operatively. Improvement rates were similar in the COME (84%) and RAOM (83%) groups.

Failure-free survival data were available for 124 patients (227 ears). At one year, failure-free probability was 93.8% (95% CI 89.7%–96.3%); at two years, 87.2% (95% CI 81.9%–91.0%); and at three years, 84.3%. Outcomes were comparable between COME and RAOM subgroups. All failures occurred within four years of surgery. Safety outcomes were favorable in the study, and no major complications (including internal carotid artery injury or pneumomediastinum) were reported. Mild complications occurred in 5.9% of patients and were transient.

Limitations include retrospective design, incomplete tympanogram follow-up, and inability to isolate the independent effect of adjunctive procedures. Nonetheless, this represents the largest pooled pediatric BDET cohort to date and supports its safety and durable efficacy in carefully selected patients.

Citation: Liu YC, et al. Balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube (BDET)-a pooled analysis in pediatric patients. Laryngoscope. 2025;135:4887-4893. doi:10.1002/lary.32356.

COMMENT: Balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for pediatric patients since December 2023. This retrospective study presents the largest pooled analysis of BDET in pediatric patients with ETD. The results demonstrate that BDET has a favorable safety profile, as well as long-lasting durability, with over 93% of patients remaining failure-free at one year and over 87% at two years. The role of BDET in pediatric patients with ETD continues to evolve, but this study suggests that BDET may be a useful treatment for children with recurrent ETD.—Robert Hong, MD, PhD

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Pediatric Tagged With: balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube, BDET, chronic otitis media with effusion, COMEIssue: May 2026

You Might Also Like:

  • Balloon Dilation Is Among the New Frontier of Eustachian Tube Care
  • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
  • Eustachian Tuboplasty: A Potential New Option for Chronic Tube Dysfunction and Patulous Disease
  • Balloon Sinuplasty Use Continues to Evolve: Procedure may complement traditional sinus surgery

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you ever participated in a professional group's advocacy or Hill Day event?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Royal Family Heritage: The Habsburg Jaw
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • What Does The Pitt Have Against Otolaryngologists?
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Society Debuts TRIO Leadership Academy
    • Innovations in Otolaryngology: Two Paths to Progress
    • How to Have Effective Presurgical Discussions
    • Advocacy: Finding Our Voice
    • A Royal Family Heritage: The Habsburg Jaw

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939