• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

CMS’ New Rule Aims to Streamline the Prior Authorization Process

by Karen Appold • December 2, 2025

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

At the state level, the AMA has supported more than a dozen states in enacting laws in 2024 that reduce the care delays and wasted time experienced by patients and physicians due to prior authorization requirements.

You Might Also Like

  • Otolaryngology Practices Use Digital Tools to Pre-authorize—With Mixed Results
  • A Look at How the AMA Supports Members and Otolaryngologists at Large
  • Do Prior Authorization Requests Hurt Patient Care?
  • Countdown to ICD-10 Winds Down as October 1 Start Date Approaches
Explore This Issue
December 2025

The AMA launched a grassroots advocacy campaign on prior authorization reform housed on the website FixPriorAuth.org. Here, patient and physician stories are collected, and the website is used as a database for advocacy purposes.

The AMA also developed 21 principles that address prior authorization reform through an AMA-convened workgroup of 17 state and specialty medical societies, national provider associations, and patient representatives, and has worked with the insurance industry on implementation, Dr. Brown said (AMA. https://tinyurl.com/2s3hdu8p).

Similarly, the AAO-HNS has been actively advocating for prior authorization reform through multiple legislative initiatives and grassroots efforts (https://tinyurl.com/mrxr5v3n). It has highlighted the specific impact of prior authorization on otolaryngology practices. Like the AMA, it strongly supports the Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act bill.

The Academy also advocates for the Safe Step Act (https://tinyurl.com/evx2fv36), which would create an expedient and medically reasonable step therapy exceptions process whereby patients could receive timely and necessary care without experiencing unnecessary delays and burdensome administrative hurdles to treatment, Dr. Brown said.

The AAO-HNS continues to work collaboratively with other medical organizations and maintains active engagement with Congress to push for meaningful prior authorization reform that would reduce administrative burdens on physicians and improve patient access to timely care, Dr. Brown said.

Looking Ahead

Dr. Brown believes payers will respond positively to CMS’s new rule. “They are aware of the outcry from patients and providers, as the call for prior authorization reform has been steadfast,” he said. “Politicians have also been aligned in their support for Medicare Advantage reform.”

“The bottom line is that Congress has been increasingly active in investigating and proposing legislation to address Medicare Advantage practices, particularly focusing on inappropriate denials of care, use of artificial intelligence in coverage decisions, marketing abuses, and overpayments that benefit insurers rather than beneficiaries,” Dr. Brown said. “Hopefully, the combined weight of these pressures will contribute to payer compliance with the new rule and its directives.”

When implemented properly, Mr. DeCabo believes that CMS’s new rule will significantly benefit both otolaryngology practices and their patients, and that the changes will create momentum on issues related to prior authorization. “The Academy will continue monitoring payer compliance to ensure they follow both the letter and spirit of these rules, not just find workarounds,” he said.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Single Page

Filed Under: Business of Medicine, Features, Health Policy, Home Slider Tagged With: CMS' New RuleIssue: December 2025

You Might Also Like:

  • Otolaryngology Practices Use Digital Tools to Pre-authorize—With Mixed Results
  • A Look at How the AMA Supports Members and Otolaryngologists at Large
  • Do Prior Authorization Requests Hurt Patient Care?
  • Countdown to ICD-10 Winds Down as October 1 Start Date Approaches

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you ever encountered a mentally or physically threatening patient or caregiver?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • More Than Skin Deep: Building a Workforce Patients Can Trust
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Otolaryngologists Apply Safety Strategies When Treating Threatening Patients
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • The Pursuit of Excellence—the Journey or the Gold
    • Is There Benefit of Music Training Following Cochlear Implantation?
    • Is Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Effective for Tinnitus?
    • Does Dupilumab Improve Sinonasal Outcomes in AERD Patients?
    • Making the Most of TRIO Meetings

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939