• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
    • History of Otolaryngology
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Creating an Environment Where People Can Do Their Best Work

by Robin W. Lindsay, MD, MBA • July 1, 2026

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Dr. Lindsay

Do you love your job? Do your patients love their experience? Do you feel that you are able to do your best work here?

You Might Also Like

  • Shhhh! Quiet Quitting Isn’t a New Idea
  • Otolaryngologists Apply Safety Strategies When Treating Threatening Patients
  • How to Prepare for the Aftermath of COVID-19
  • Effectively Accommodate Employee Time Off in Your Medical Practice
Explore This Issue
July 2026

In a perfect world, everyone in healthcare would answer “yes” to all three questions. While universal agreement may be unrealistic, it should still be our aspiration.

When people think about creating a great workplace, they often focus on resources: adequate staffing, sufficient clinic space, operating room access, technology, and financial support. These are essential. They allow us to do our jobs. But they do not necessarily allow us to do our best work.

What transforms a workplace from functional to exceptional?

In a recent Harvard Business Review IdeaCast, Marcus Buckingham discussed themes from his book Design Love In. He challenged organizations to move beyond measuring satisfaction with net promoter scores and instead to examine moments of extreme positive and negative experiences. Those moments reveal what people truly value. His premise is simple but powerful: Sustainable excellence occurs when people feel more like themselves over time. In other words, they flourish.

If we want extraordinary outcomes, we must create extraordinary experiences.

For employees, that means creating environments where people do not feel powerless. They have autonomy. They feel understood. They know their contributions matter. They believe others care about them as people, not simply as producers of work. For patients, it means creating experiences where they feel heard, respected, and empowered to participate in their care.

These ideas align closely with what leadership research consistently tells us. Great leaders build trust, stay connected, and help others shine. They align operations with strategy so that daily work supports organizational goals. They provide timely, well-intentioned feedback. They create opportunities for people to contribute, grow, and take ownership of meaningful work.

At the center of all of this is psychological safety.

Google’s well-known Project Aristotle identified psychological safety as the most important characteristic of high-performing teams. Yet healthcare often focuses on psychological safety for trainees while overlooking an equally important truth: Faculty and staff need psychological safety as well. Recent work in surgical education describes a “trickle-down effect” in which faculty who feel unable to admit mistakes, ask for help, or challenge assumptions struggle to create the supportive learning environments they hope to provide for trainees.

Creating psychological safety requires more than encouraging people to speak up. Organizations must reward candor rather than punish it. Leaders must practice what some have called “ostentatious listening,” making it visible that employee concerns are heard, considered, and acted upon. This is the foundation of institutional courage: Creating systems where concerns can be raised without fear of retaliation and where accountability flows in both directions. When institutional courage is absent, institutional betrayal can emerge. Employees become disengaged, wellness declines, productivity suffers, and talented people leave.

Community matters too. Research on belonging consistently shows that people thrive when they feel connected to something larger than themselves. Workplaces should foster relationships, mentorship, teaching, and shared purpose. The bonds that unite us must be stronger than the forces that divide us.

Ultimately, culture can be measured by a simple question: Can people do their best work here?

When the answer is yes, employees flourish, patients benefit, and organizations succeed. The organizations that thrive in the future will not be those that simply extract more productivity from their people. They will be those that create environments where people can bring their best selves to work, do their best work, and leave each day believing that their work and they themselves matter. Creating that environment may be one of the most important responsibilities of leadership and one of the greatest opportunities facing healthcare today.   

—Robin

Filed Under: ENT Perspectives, Letter From the Editor Tagged With: work cultureIssue: July 2026

You Might Also Like:

  • Shhhh! Quiet Quitting Isn’t a New Idea
  • Otolaryngologists Apply Safety Strategies When Treating Threatening Patients
  • How to Prepare for the Aftermath of COVID-19
  • Effectively Accommodate Employee Time Off in Your Medical Practice

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

How have you adopted advanced technologies in your practice?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Novel Treatments and Advances in OSA
    • The Reasons We Keep Going
    • Onboarding and Working with APPs
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • ENTtoday Wins 2026 APEX Award
    • AI-Powered Real-Time Multimodal Model for Predicting Recurrence and Survival in Head and Neck Cancer: A Multicenter, Multinational Study
    • Voices of Leadership: Challenges Faced by Female Facial Plastic Surgeons and Considerations for Future Generations
    • AI in the Diagnosis of Cholesteatoma: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence
    • Gender Identity Disparities in Early Adolescent Sleep: Findings from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939