• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
    • History of Otolaryngology
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

DB-OTO Gene Therapy for Inherited Deafness

by Pinky Sharma • September 3, 2026

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

CLINICAL QUESTION

Can intracochlear DB-OTO gene therapy restore natural acoustic hearing in children with profound congenital deafness caused by biallelic OTOF variants?

You Might Also Like

  • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
  • From Genes to Hearing: What Otolaryngologists Need to Know About Gene Therapy for Hearing Loss
  • Innovations in Otolaryngology: Two Paths to Progress
  • What Otolaryngologists Need to Know About Working with Patients as Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids Become Available
Explore This Issue
September 2026

BOTTOM LINE

In this first-in-human, open-label study, DB-OTO improved hearing in most children with OTOF-related deafness. At 24 weeks, nine of 12 participants met the primary efficacy endpoint, six could hear soft speech without assistive devices, and three achieved average normal hearing sensitivity.

BACKGROUND: OTOF-related deafness is caused by a deficiency of otoferlin, a protein required for synaptic transmission between the sensory inner hair cells and the auditory nerve. Affected children are typically born with profound deafness and are usually managed with cochlear implants. Because inner ear structures may remain intact, OTOF gene replacement could potentially restore physiologic sound detection.

STUDY DESIGN: Ongoing open-label, single-group, first-in-human phase 1–2 study amended to registrational status after early efficacy signals. DB-OTO is a dual adeno-associated virus 1 vector delivering human OTOF complementary DNA under a hair cell-specific promoter. Children received a single intracochlear infusion of DB-OTO in one or both ears.

SETTING: Multicenter CHORD trial in pediatric patients with OTOF-related profound congenital deafness

SYNOPSIS: The study included 12 children aged 10 months to 16 years with biallelic OTOF variants and profound deafness, defined as an average audiometric threshold greater than 90 dB HL. Nine participants received DB-OTO in one ear; three received DB-OTO in both ears during a single session. The primary endpoint was a behavioral pure-tone audiometry average threshold of less than 70 dB HL at week 24, a level the authors describe as generally avoiding cochlear implantation and enabling natural acoustic hearing.

At week 24, nine of 12 participants met the primary endpoint (75%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 43–95; P=1.1×10−13). The same proportion met the key secondary endpoint of auditory brainstem response to a click stimulus at less than 90 dB normalized hearing level. Among unilateral-treatment participants, six of nine treated ears met the primary endpoint compared with zero of nine untreated ears. All three bilateral-treatment participants met the primary endpoint based on the better-performing ear.

Clinically, six participants achieved soft-speech sensitivity, and three achieved average normal hearing sensitivity. Eight participants had follow-up beyond week 24, with hearing generally stable or improved.

A total of 67 adverse events occurred or worsened during or after treatment; 17 were considered related to surgical delivery. Two serious adverse events occurred—mastoiditis in an implanted contralateral ear and walking instability—and both resolved without sequelae. No adverse event led to study discontinuation, and no persistent vestibular safety signal was identified. Limitations include small sample size, single-group design, limited follow-up, and partial post hoc evolution of the trial design.

CITATION: Valayannopoulos V, et al. DB-OTO gene therapy for inherited deafness. N Engl J Med. 2026;394:1074-1083. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2400521.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Pediatric Issue: September 2026

You Might Also Like:

  • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
  • From Genes to Hearing: What Otolaryngologists Need to Know About Gene Therapy for Hearing Loss
  • Innovations in Otolaryngology: Two Paths to Progress
  • What Otolaryngologists Need to Know About Working with Patients as Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids Become Available

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Where should ENT publications draw the line on authors' use of generative AI?

View Results

Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Rhinology’s Persistent Gender Gap
  • The Example We Set: Thoughts on the End of Residency Training
  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • ENTs Urged to Look Beyond Refractory Sinus Disease for Underlying Immune Deficiency
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • History of the Cochlear Implant
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • ENTs Urged to Look Beyond Refractory Sinus Disease for Underlying Immune Deficiency
    • When a “Blocked Ear” Isn’t Obstructive ETD
    • What Does It Mean to Be Written by a Human?
    • Reevaluating the CMS 90-Day CPAP Adherence Requirement: Persistent Use Among Early Nonadherent Patients
    • Vocal Outcomes After COVR in Porcine Bilateral Vocal Fold Resection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939