ENTtoday
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
    • eNewsletters
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

Ethical Challenges in the Operating Room, Part II

by G. Richard Holt, MD, MSE, MPH, MABE, D Bioethics • January 21, 2017

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

Editor’s note: This is part 2 of a two-part series on ethics in the operating room. The first installment was published in the October 2016 issue.

You might also like:

  • Ethical Challenges in the Operating Room
  • Disclosure of Adverse Outcomes Brings Ethical Challenges for Otolaryngologists
  • Avoiding the Operating Room: The Advantages of Office-Based Laryngology and Esophagology
  • What Are Physicians’ Ethical Responsibilities to Respond to Medical Emergencies?
Explore this issue:
January 2017

Scenario

The ethical scenario published in part 1 of “Ethics in the Operating Room” imagined that you served as chair of your medical center’s ethics committee and provided guidance and recommendations to the center’s leadership on issues of ethical concern in the operating room.

In that scenario, your comments to the leadership dealt with informing patients about the roles of the various surgical team members participating in the patient’s surgery, along with the ethics of overlapping, concomitant/concurrent, and sequenced surgical procedures. The next major topic on which the leadership would like your input involves the professional and ethical care of patients in the perioperative period, particularly the interaction of the surgeon with the patient at the bedside.

Discussion

The specialty of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery has, for various reasons, moved away from inpatient care to predominantly outpatient care, save for head and neck oncology, neurotology, trauma surgery, and specific circumstances of other subspecialties for which patients are hospitalized longer than overnight.

Generally speaking, however, hospital rounds with faculty, residents, and medical students in our specialty have largely been replaced by in vitro rounds in a conference room, involving Powerpoint presentations, imaging studies, patient photographs, and other data pertinent to a patient’s disorder. Teaching in the presence of patients can still take place during the clinic evaluation, which can be referred to as “chair-side rounds,” and in the emergency center, where the focus is generally on expediency.

© Everett Collection / SHUTTERSTOCK.COM

© Everett Collection / SHUTTERSTOCK.COM

When it comes to strengthening the patient-physician relationship, however, there may be no better way to do so than with the true “bedside” encounter, when the patient is most vulnerable and the physician can be most caring and compassionate.

The unique circumstances of the perioperative period should be viewed from the patient’s perspective to get a sense of the anxieties experienced by most surgical patients as they are being prepared for surgery, entering the operating room, and then recovering from the surgery. The compassionate surgeon can help alleviate these concerns with her/his bedside manner. The ethical responsibility to address the vulnerabilities of surgical patients rests not just with the surgeon, but with the entire team caring for the patient in the perioperative period.

Because the otolaryngologist-head and neck surgeon is the de facto leader of the patient care team, it falls to her/him to set the proper expectations for an ethical and professional interaction with the patient. It is important to resist the desensitization and cynicism that can be observed in all quarters of the surgical profession, which can lead to an indifference that can be sensed by patients at the time they most require caring attention at the bedside. This responsibility is well stated in the Code of Ethics of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery: “The Physician-Patient Relationship—‘Each patient must be treated with respect, dignity, compassion, and honesty’” (available at entnet.org/content/ethics).

Pages: 1 2 3 4 Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Features, Home Slider Tagged With: bedside medicine, Ethics, operating room, surgeriesIssue: January 2017

You might also like:

  • Ethical Challenges in the Operating Room
  • Disclosure of Adverse Outcomes Brings Ethical Challenges for Otolaryngologists
  • Avoiding the Operating Room: The Advantages of Office-Based Laryngology and Esophagology
  • What Are Physicians’ Ethical Responsibilities to Respond to Medical Emergencies?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • How Writing Helps a Medical Resident Better Care for Patients
  • How Physicians Can Build a Network to Boost Their Career
  • How To Survive the First Year of Medical Residency
  • ACGME Revises Cap on Resident Work Hours
  • Ethical Implications of Burnout in Otolaryngology Residents
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Counseling Patients on Safe Nasal Irrigation
    • Is There a Crisis in the Otolaryngology Match?
    • Weaning Patients Off of PPIs
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Eustachian Tuboplasty: A Potential New Option for Chronic Tube Dysfunction and Patulous Disease
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Short-and Long-Term Data Suggest Efficacy of Turbinate Ablation
    • Counseling Patients on Safe Nasal Irrigation
    • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Otolaryngology
    • Letter from the Editor: Peer Reviewing Sensational Headlines
    • Is Topical Epinephrine Safe for Hemostasis in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery?
    • Is it Safe to Kiss in Era of HPV Head and Neck Cancer ‘Epidemic’?

Polls

Is artificial intelligence an advantage for medicine?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Triological Meeting Posters

Wiley
© 2019 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
This site uses cookies: Find out more.