• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
    • History of Otolaryngology
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

From Part-Time to Full-Time: The Rise of Otolaryngology in 20th-Century American Medicine

by Matthew Miller, MD • April 8, 2026

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Despite early success, by 1950, “conventional wisdom said that otolaryngology was a dying specialty” (Otolaryngol Clin North Am. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2007.07.001). In 1951, one in three otolaryngology residency positions remained unfilled (Laryngoscope. doi: 10.1097/00005537- 199610000-00001). Antibiotics could now cure infections such as tonsillitis and sinusitis that previously had been the focus of many otolaryngology departments.

You Might Also Like

  • Trio Meeting: Recognizing Excellence in Otolaryngology
  • COSM13: Physician Advocates Early Specialization in Head and Neck Surgery for Residents
  • Celebrating Excellence in Otolaryngology
  • Otolaryngologists Find Creative Ways To Offer Cancer Screening to High-Risk Populations
Explore This Issue
April 2026

While specialization in U.S. medicine initially created interdependence among physicians, boundaries between the different specialties often included a gray area where patient assignment remained unclear. This gray area ultimately created competition between specialties, including general surgery and otolaryngology, which both wanted inclusion of head and neck cancer in their respective specialties. According to Calhoun, Davis, and Templer, “[In 1950,] head and neck cancer and thyroid surgery were commonly the purview of general surgeons, and cosmetic surgery was generally performed by plastic surgeons.” This control over head and neck cancer became even more important as federal research funding played an increasingly important role in academic medical centers in the post-World War II era. While much otolaryngology funding comes from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders today, this institute was not founded until 1988. The National Cancer Institute, though, was established in 1937 and funded head and neck cancer research from its early years.

Competition between general surgeons and otolaryngologists over the field of head and neck surgery increased during the 1950s. In 1954, the Society of Head and Neck Surgeons (SHNS) was founded and consisted primarily of general surgeons, and several years later, in 1958, a group comprised mostly of otolaryngologists formed a “parallel society,” the American Society for Head and Neck Surgery (ASHNS) (American Head & Neck Society. http://www.ahns.info/history-ahns).

Ultimately, over the next four decades, otolaryngology gained dominance over the head and neck subspecialty, and in 1998, the SHNS and ASHNS merged to form the American Head & Neck Society. Elliot Strong, a renowned head and neck surgeon with general surgery training, later wrote, “When I first started, of course, the controversy between the disciplines of surgery and otolaryngology was on the minds of most people …. As time has gone on, the demands for specialty and sub-specialty surgical training have increased, and I think in all honesty have tended to favor the otolaryngologist and his training as opposed to that of general surgery. The opportunities for a general surgeon in otolaryngology and head and neck surgery have diminished, and probably rightfully so.” (American Head & Neck Society. http://www.headandneckcancer.org/history/strong/).

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Articles, History of Otolaryngology, Home Slider Tagged With: History of OtolaryngologyIssue: April 2026

You Might Also Like:

  • Trio Meeting: Recognizing Excellence in Otolaryngology
  • COSM13: Physician Advocates Early Specialization in Head and Neck Surgery for Residents
  • Celebrating Excellence in Otolaryngology
  • Otolaryngologists Find Creative Ways To Offer Cancer Screening to High-Risk Populations

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

How have you adopted advanced technologies in your practice?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Dr. Rebecca Howell’s Circuitous, Yet Serendipitous, Path to Laryngology
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Onboarding and Working with APPs
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • ENTtoday Wins 2026 APEX Award
    • AI-Powered Real-Time Multimodal Model for Predicting Recurrence and Survival in Head and Neck Cancer: A Multicenter, Multinational Study
    • Voices of Leadership: Challenges Faced by Female Facial Plastic Surgeons and Considerations for Future Generations
    • AI in the Diagnosis of Cholesteatoma: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence
    • Gender Identity Disparities in Early Adolescent Sleep: Findings from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939