• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
    • History of Otolaryngology
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Impact of Proposed Medicare Policy Changes for Botulinum Toxin Coverage on Hemifacial Spasm and Facial Dystonia

by Pinky Sharma • September 3, 2026

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

CLINICAL QUESTION

How might proposed Medicare coverage restrictions on botulinum toxin injections affect patients with hemifacial spasm, facial dystonia, and nonflaccid facial paralysis?

You Might Also Like

  • Proposal Would Limit Use of Botulinum Toxin on Patients with Hemifacial Spasm and Facial Dystonia
  • Botulinum Toxin Injections for ADSD and Chronic Salivary Aspiration
  • Long-Term Botulinum Toxin Management of OMD
  • Prescription Drug Benefit Primer
Explore This Issue
September 2026

BOTTOM LINE

The proposed Medicare policy could restrict individualized botulinum toxin treatment by limiting reimbursable injection sites and initial dosing. The authors argue that these restrictions may result in undertreatment, persistent functional and psychosocial symptoms, medication waste, and potentially greater healthcare utilization.

BACKGROUND: Hemifacial spasm and facial dystonia cause involuntary facial movements that may impair speech, eating, vision, comfort, emotional expression, and social interaction. Botulinum toxin is a principal treatment because it reduces abnormal muscle activity, improves facial symmetry, and may lessen associated anxiety, depression, and quality-of-life impairment.

STUDY DESIGN: Viewpoint article examining a proposed Medicare Local Coverage Determination for botulinum toxin injections and discussing its potential clinical, ethical, and economic implications. The authors contextualized the proposed restrictions using published evidence on botulinum toxin dosing and outcomes in facial movement disorders.

SETTING: Facial plastic and reconstructive surgery practice and Medicare coverage policy in the U.S.

SYNOPSIS: The article evaluates CGS Administrators’ proposed Local Coverage Determination for botulinum toxin injections, which would reimburse only one injection per defined site regardless of the number of injection points used. The proposal also describes an initial total dose of 25-30 botulinum toxin units across selected muscles on the affected side of the face—including the orbicularis oculi, procerus, mentalis, platysma, orbicularis oris, and depressor anguli oris—with an additional 5-15 units potentially allowed after one year. The authors contend that these limits do not reflect the variability and complexity of facial movement disorders. Published dosing ranges cited in the article extend from 7.5-90 units for hemifacial spasm to 4-220 units across facial muscles for facial dystonia. Effective treatment may require several injection points within one muscle and treatment of both affected and contralateral compensatory muscles to optimize symmetry and function. The policy may also affect patients with nonflaccid facial paralysis, although this population is not clearly addressed. Botulinum toxin doses reported for these patients range from 2-106 units, and treatment may improve synkinesis, facial function, symmetry, psychological symptoms, and quality of life.

The authors warn that insufficient dosing could leave patients with residual spasms, pain, visual or oral functional limitations, and psychosocial distress. Lower dose limits might also increase follow-up visits and healthcare use while creating waste, because botulinum toxin is commonly supplied in single-use 50- or 100-unit vials. Finally, the authors call for policy revision in collaboration with facial nerve specialists and other stakeholders.

CITATION: Barna AJ, et al. Impact of proposed Medicare policy changes for botulinum toxin coverage on hemifacial spasm and facial dystonia. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2025;27:513-515. doi:10.1089/fpsam.2024.0281.

COMMENT: Proposed Medicare coverage changes for botulinum toxin in treating hemifacial spasm, facial dystonia, and synkinesis would significantly impair clinicians’ abilities to treat these patients. This chemodenervation treatment is evidence based, and the proposed changes ignore this evidence. Barna et al. nicely summarize the proposed changes and negative impacts they would have on patient care. –Matthew Q. Miller, MD

Filed Under: Facial Plastic/Reconstructive, Literature Reviews Issue: September 2026

You Might Also Like:

  • Proposal Would Limit Use of Botulinum Toxin on Patients with Hemifacial Spasm and Facial Dystonia
  • Botulinum Toxin Injections for ADSD and Chronic Salivary Aspiration
  • Long-Term Botulinum Toxin Management of OMD
  • Prescription Drug Benefit Primer

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Where should ENT publications draw the line on authors' use of generative AI?

View Results

Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Rhinology’s Persistent Gender Gap
  • The Example We Set: Thoughts on the End of Residency Training
  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • ENTs Urged to Look Beyond Refractory Sinus Disease for Underlying Immune Deficiency
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • History of the Cochlear Implant
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • ENTs Urged to Look Beyond Refractory Sinus Disease for Underlying Immune Deficiency
    • When a “Blocked Ear” Isn’t Obstructive ETD
    • What Does It Mean to Be Written by a Human?
    • Reevaluating the CMS 90-Day CPAP Adherence Requirement: Persistent Use Among Early Nonadherent Patients
    • Vocal Outcomes After COVR in Porcine Bilateral Vocal Fold Resection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939