• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
    • History of Otolaryngology
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Multi-Institutional Validation of the Interarytenoid Assessment Protocol for Pediatric Laryngeal Cleft

by Jennifer M. Siu, MD, MPH, Shaunak Amin, MD, Evan J. Propst, MD, MSc, Nikolaus E. Wolter, MD, MSc, Jeremy Prager, MD, Michelle Wyatt, MD, Claire Lawlor, MD, Douglas Sidell, MD, Deepak Mehta, MD, Reema Padia, MD, Nicholas Smith, MD, Christopher Hartnick, MD, MS, Catherine K. Hart, MD, MS, Xing Wang, PhD, and Kaalan Johnson, MD • September 3, 2026

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

INTRODUCTION

Current assessment techniques for laryngeal clefts are highly variable, both across and within pediatric institutions. Previous reports have shown a discrepancy in the definitions of, and differentiation across, a normal larynx, deep interarytenoid notch (DIN), and Benjamin-Inglis type I laryngeal cleft (T1C). This discrepancy was highlighted in the 2017 consensus guidelines created by the International Pediatric Otolaryngology Group (IPOG) on the diagnosis and management of T1Cs1, where most IPOG members reported that they diagnose DINs based on visual inspection, while others defined a DIN as having a height less than 3 mm but remaining above the level of the true vocal folds. Within the guidelines, differentiating among normal anatomy, DIN, and T1C in addition to functional sequelae is important, given that it determines whether patients should be considered for surgical intervention.

You Might Also Like

  • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
  • Clinical Grading System for Reinke’s Edema
  • In-Office Laryngeal Procedures in Awake Patients a Viable, and Often Preferable, Option
  • Vocal Fold Paresis: A Well-Recognized Condition of Ambiguous Significance
Explore This Issue
September 2026

To standardize descriptions of the interarytenoid mucosal height (IAMH), the Interarytenoid Assessment Protocol (IAAP) was developed. This protocol involves placing the patient in suspension with laryngeal distending forceps, palpating the interarytenoid musculature for subjective qualities, then swinging a right-angle microlaryngeal probe from the anterolateral interarytenoid mucosa toward the laryngeal anatomy to determine the point of initial mucosal contact, which is designated as the IAMH. The IAMH is then categorized as being at one of five levels in relation to the false vocal folds, ventricle, and true vocal folds. To date, a single institutional validation study has demonstrated substantial inter- and intra-rater reliability of the IAAP, but no multi-institutional validation studies have been conducted. The objective of this project was to perform a multi-institutional validation study to assess the reliability of the IAAP for evaluation of the IAMH.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 30 endoscopic videos of the IAAP from the Seattle Children’s Hospital Otolaryngology Database. Each of the IAAP procedures was performed by either an attending pediatric otolaryngologist or a resident/fellow supervised by an attending pediatric otolaryngologist at the same institution. Institutional review board (IRB) approval was obtained at the Seattle Children’s Hospital (IRB No. STUDY00000815).

Sample Selection

Figure 1: IAAP steps. (A) Step 1: Insert and suspend laryngoscope. This should be performed to optimize a Cormach-Lehane13 grade I exposure if possible. (B) Step 2: Insert laryngeal distending forceps. Infant distenders are best used for children up to approximately age five years; adult distenders may be used in older patients. The larynx should be distended to allow adequate visualization of the height of the interarytenoid mucosa, while not overdistending to avoid distorting the anatomy. Appropriate distension will position the vocal folds at an approximate 30-degree angle—most pediatric patients only require distension to the first “click” after touching the tissue. (C) Step 3: Palpate the interarytenoid region. Perform palpation using a nerve hook, right-angle microlaryngeal probe, or right-angle laryngeal measuring stick. Palpate and observe the bulk of the interarytenoid muscle anteroposterior and craniocaudal extent. Palpate the surface of the cricoid to observe for clefts or defects. (C) Step 3: Check for submucosal laryngeal clefts. These abnormalities, if found, should be described subjectively in documentation. (D) Step 4: Objective assessment of IAMH. With the right hand carefully braced on the patient’s face or the laryngoscope to prevent movement in or out, use the right angle microlaryngeal probe to swing anterolaterally from a resting place in contact with but not distorting the interarytenoid mucosa to an anterolateral point in line with the midpoint of the membranous TVFs to determine anatomical reference to the following laryngeal landmarks: (a) above FVFs, (b) at FVFs, (c) in ventricle, (d) at TVFs, and (e) below TVFs. (E, F) Setup for IAAP: patient placed in suspension, elastic band to secure laryngeal distending forceps, 0-degree telescope in left hand, microlaryngeal probe in right hand.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: How I Do It, Pediatric, Practice Focus Issue: September 2026

You Might Also Like:

  • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
  • Clinical Grading System for Reinke’s Edema
  • In-Office Laryngeal Procedures in Awake Patients a Viable, and Often Preferable, Option
  • Vocal Fold Paresis: A Well-Recognized Condition of Ambiguous Significance

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Where should ENT publications draw the line on authors' use of generative AI?

View Results

Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Rhinology’s Persistent Gender Gap
  • The Example We Set: Thoughts on the End of Residency Training
  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • ENTs Urged to Look Beyond Refractory Sinus Disease for Underlying Immune Deficiency
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • History of the Cochlear Implant
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • ENTs Urged to Look Beyond Refractory Sinus Disease for Underlying Immune Deficiency
    • When a “Blocked Ear” Isn’t Obstructive ETD
    • What Does It Mean to Be Written by a Human?
    • Reevaluating the CMS 90-Day CPAP Adherence Requirement: Persistent Use Among Early Nonadherent Patients
    • Vocal Outcomes After COVR in Porcine Bilateral Vocal Fold Resection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939