• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
    • History of Otolaryngology
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Patient and Procedural Predictors of Early Recovery Quality after Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery

by Pinky Sharma • June 3, 2026

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Clinical Question

Which patient and procedural factors influence early post-operative recovery quality and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) outcomes after endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES)?

You Might Also Like

  • Migraine-Associated Dizziness Is Elusive to Diagnose
  • A Personal Spin on Migraine-Associated Vertigo Treatments: With few formal guidelines, otolaryngologists use trial and error
  • Targeting Headaches: Trigger release surgery an option for patients with chronic migraine
  • Depression, Anxiety Rarely Assessed in Patients with Otolaryngologic Disorders
Explore This Issue
June 2026

Bottom Line

Procedural factors such as nasal packing and anesthetic type significantly influence PACU length of stay, while neuropsychiatric comorbidities—including depression, migraine, and anxiety—are key determinants of patient-reported recovery quality. Oral acetaminophen may improve early recovery outcomes.

Background: Endoscopic endonasal surgery is commonly performed for sinonasal disease and is generally well tolerated; however, variability in early post-operative recovery—including pain, nausea, and PACU duration—can affect patient experience and healthcare efficiency. Data guiding short-term recovery expectations and optimization strategies remain limited.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing EES (January 2024 to March 2025). Demographic and procedural variables, as well as comorbidities, were reviewed, and Lasso regression was used to evaluate associations between key outcomes: PACU length of stay (PACU-LoS), morphine equivalents (PACU-ME), and 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) scores.

Setting: Single academic tertiary-care center (University of Washington)

SYNOPSIS: The cohort included 110 patients (69% female; median age 41 years). Common comorbidities included anxiety (40%), depression (37%), migraine (25%), and chronic pain disorders (20%). Mean PACU length of stay was 59 minutes, average PACU-ME was 38.13 mg, and mean QoR-15 score was 112.25, reflecting overall good recovery.

Procedural factors strongly influenced PACU outcomes. Nasal packing increased PACU-LoS by approximately 12.5 minutes, while total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) reduced PACU-LoS by about 6.7 minutes. Infraorbital nerve block was associated with a modest increase in PACU duration. Opioid use and operative factors such as blood loss and procedure duration had moderate effects on PACU time.

In contrast, patient comorbidities were the primary determinants of recovery quality. Depression had the largest negative impact on QoR-15 scores (−8.38), exceeding the minimal clinically important difference, followed by migraine (−5.80) and anxiety (−3.31). Doyle splint placement also modestly reduced recovery scores.

Importantly, oral acetaminophen administered in the PACU improved QoR-15 scores (+2.07), suggesting benefits extending beyond its pharmacologic half-life into early recovery. No strong independent predictors of opioid requirements were identified in multivariable analysis.

Limitations include retrospective design, single-center setting, and potential influence of nonclinical factors such as institutional workflow. Nevertheless, the study highlights actionable perioperative factors that can optimize early recovery and patient counseling.

Citation: Fernández-Penny FE, et al. Patient and procedural predictors of early recovery quality after endoscopic endonasal surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2025;15:1412-1415. doi:10.1002/alr.70037.

Comment: This manuscript explores factors related to the quality of the immediate recovery following bread-and-butter nasal and sinus surgery. Given that these interventions are performed for quality of life, it’s important to consider the patient’s experience and ease of recovery. Patient selection, intra-operative, and post-operative factors were all found to be influential in a satisfying outcome. From a patient standpoint, comorbid diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and migraine were all associated with worse recovery quality. Operatively, TIVA reduced PACU stay (while nasal packing understandably increased duration), and acetaminophen given in the PACU provided benefits that outlasted the half-life of the medication. Given the frequency with which these surgeries are performed, it is important to counsel patients on expectations, incorporating their past history, and some relatively easy interventions (TIVA, immediate post-op acetaminophen) can enhance the recovery experience. —Ashoke Khanwalkar, MD

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Rhinology Issue: June 2026

You Might Also Like:

  • Migraine-Associated Dizziness Is Elusive to Diagnose
  • A Personal Spin on Migraine-Associated Vertigo Treatments: With few formal guidelines, otolaryngologists use trial and error
  • Targeting Headaches: Trigger release surgery an option for patients with chronic migraine
  • Depression, Anxiety Rarely Assessed in Patients with Otolaryngologic Disorders

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you participated in any leadership training to further your career?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Taking Otolaryngology Call in the ED and Hospital: Duty or Burden?
    • Houston, We Have a Problem
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • History of the Cochlear Implant
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Otolaryngology Hospitalists: A Relatively New Role
    • Feeling the Squeeze
    • Patient and Procedural Predictors of Early Recovery Quality after Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery
    • What’s New Versus Tried and True in Pulsatile Tinnitus
    • The Impact of Chronic Particulate Matter Exposure on Quality-of-Life Outcomes after ESS

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939