• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
    • History of Otolaryngology
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Reevaluating the CMS 90-Day CPAP Adherence Requirement: Persistent Use Among Early Nonadherent Patients

by Pinky Sharma • October 2, 2026

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

CLINICAL QUESTION

Do patients with obstructive sleep apnea who fail to meet the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) 90-day continuous positive airway pressure adherence threshold continue using therapy at one year?

You Might Also Like

  • CMS Reimburses Sleep Apnea CPAP Treatment When Diagnosed with Home Testing
  • Temporary Trial May Improve Compliance with CPAP
  • Why Otolaryngologists Have an Advantage When Dual Boarding in Sleep Medicine
  • Evaluation and Management of Patients After Unsuccessful Sleep Apnea Surgery
Explore This Issue
October 2026

BOTTOM LINE

More than one-third of patients who failed to meet the CMS 90-day adherence threshold were still using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) at one year, with average use sufficient to provide symptomatic benefit. These findings question the assumption that poor early adherence predicts treatment abandonment and support evaluating CPAP success using patient-centered outcomes rather than rigid usage criteria.

BACKGROUND: CMS requires early CPAP adherence to maintain coverage despite limited supporting evidence. This study evaluated long-term CPAP use and treatment abandonment in a healthcare system that continued coverage regardless of early adherence.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study of adults with obstructive sleep apnea who received CPAP between 2020 and 2023. Patients were stratified according to whether they met the CMS 90-day adherence threshold, and device use was evaluated during month 12, defined as days 330 through 360 after treatment initiation.

SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Southern California, an integrated healthcare system that continued CPAP coverage regardless of early adherence

SYNOPSIS: The analysis included 132,492 adults with at least one recorded CPAP-use episode during the first year after device dispensation. Mean age was 55.0 years, 65.5% were men, and mean apnea–hypopnea index using a 4% desaturation criterion was 32.5 events per hour.

Overall, 49.0% of patients met the CMS adherence requirement within 90 days. The proportion was higher among patients aged 65 years or older, at 53.5%. Failure to meet the requirement was associated with younger age, female sex, non-white race or ethnicity, lower socioeconomic status, and less severe obstructive sleep apnea. Among the 67,906 patients who did not meet the initial CMS threshold, 36.0% demonstrated some CPAP use during month 12. Among these continued users, mean use was 197 minutes per night, and CPAP was used for at least four hours on an average of 42.9% of nights.

Considering all patients who were initially CMS-nonadherent, 20.9% averaged at least two hours of CPAP use per night during month 12, and 13.6% averaged at least four hours. Corresponding rates among patients aged 65 years or older were 23.3% and 16.5%, respectively. The findings challenge the use of a fixed early-adherence threshold as a proxy for long-term treatment failure. However, this conference abstract reports device-use data rather than symptom improvement or clinical outcomes, and results from an integrated system that maintained coverage may not generalize to settings where therapy is withdrawn after early nonadherence.

CITATION: Billings M, et al. Reevaluating the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 90-day CPAP adherence requirement: persistent use among early nonadherent patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2026;212. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajrccm/aamag162.6465.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Sleep Medicine Tagged With: OSAIssue: October 2026

You Might Also Like:

  • CMS Reimburses Sleep Apnea CPAP Treatment When Diagnosed with Home Testing
  • Temporary Trial May Improve Compliance with CPAP
  • Why Otolaryngologists Have an Advantage When Dual Boarding in Sleep Medicine
  • Evaluation and Management of Patients After Unsuccessful Sleep Apnea Surgery

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Where should ENT publications draw the line on authors' use of generative AI?

View Results

Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Rhinology’s Persistent Gender Gap
  • The Example We Set: Thoughts on the End of Residency Training
  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • ENTs Urged to Look Beyond Refractory Sinus Disease for Underlying Immune Deficiency
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • History of the Cochlear Implant
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • ENTs Urged to Look Beyond Refractory Sinus Disease for Underlying Immune Deficiency
    • When a “Blocked Ear” Isn’t Obstructive ETD
    • What Does It Mean to Be Written by a Human?
    • Reevaluating the CMS 90-Day CPAP Adherence Requirement: Persistent Use Among Early Nonadherent Patients
    • Vocal Outcomes After COVR in Porcine Bilateral Vocal Fold Resection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939