• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
    • History of Otolaryngology
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Should Patients with Posterior Nasal Packing Require ICU Admission?

by C. Eduardo Corrales, MD, and Richard L. Goode, MD • September 7, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Trio Best PracticeBackground

Ten percent of all episodes of epistaxis occur in the posterior nose, making posterior epistaxis a commonly encountered emergency for both emergency department physicians and otolaryngologists. Severe idiopathic nontraumatic posterior nasal epistaxis is an otolaryngologic emergency that occurs primarily in middle aged and elderly individuals who often have underlying chronic cardiac and respiratory comorbidities. Sudden unexplained deaths have been reported with posterior nasal packing as well as respiratory distress, hypoxia, cardiac dysrhythmias, myocardial infarction, and cerebral ischemia. Once the bleeding has been controlled with posterior packing, the decision of where to admit the patient for observation must be made. Because of the above complications, debate remains as to whether patients with posterior nasal packing require intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring.

You Might Also Like

  • When Is Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Nasal Packing Indicated?
  • Is Posterior Nasal Nerve Ablation Effective in Treating Symptoms of Allergic Rhinitis?
  • Are Routine Dissolvable Nasal Dressings Necessary Following ESS?
  • Can Posterior Septal Nasal Floor Mucosal Flap During Skull Base Reconstruction Repair Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks?
Explore This Issue
September 2014

Best Practice

The literature reporting ward admission of patients with epistaxis treated with posterior nasal packing is relatively poor. There are no prospective randomized studies specifically analyzing this question. The preponderance of published evidence suggest admitting most patients with posterior nasal packing to the otolaryngology ward, with continuous pulse oximetry, and selectively admitting some patients with serious comorbidities (heart disease, arrhythmias, OSA) or major blood loss to higher levels of care. Read the full article in The Laryngoscope.

Filed Under: Practice Focus, Rhinology, TRIO Best Practices Tagged With: ICU, rhinologyIssue: September 2014

You Might Also Like:

  • When Is Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Nasal Packing Indicated?
  • Is Posterior Nasal Nerve Ablation Effective in Treating Symptoms of Allergic Rhinitis?
  • Are Routine Dissolvable Nasal Dressings Necessary Following ESS?
  • Can Posterior Septal Nasal Floor Mucosal Flap During Skull Base Reconstruction Repair Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Do you think GLP-1s are the next big disruptors in ENT practice?

View Results

Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • The Example We Set: Thoughts on the End of Residency Training
  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • How to Avoid These 10 Difficult Airway Pitfalls
    • History of the Cochlear Implant
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Facial Nerve Paralysis: Protecting the Eye and Restoring Function
    • Multi-Institutional Validation of the Interarytenoid Assessment Protocol for Pediatric Laryngeal Cleft
    • DB-OTO Gene Therapy for Inherited Deafness
    • Wearable AR for Nystagmus Examination in Patients with Vertigo: Randomized Crossover Usability Study
    • Increased Prevalence of Hearing Loss and Tinnitus in Patients with Retinal Vein Occlusion

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939