• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
    • History of Otolaryngology
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Stereotactic Radiation an Option for Acoustic Neuromas But Hearing Loss a Risk

by Heather Lindsey • May 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The tumor itself, which generally stops growing but is not removed, may also contribute to hearing loss, said Dr. Bigelow. Even patients who have chosen to undergo observation rather than radiation will often experience hearing loss over time, even if the tumor does not grow, he said. The longer you watch with acoustic neuroma, the greater the chances that hearing will get worse, explained Dr. Bigelow.

You Might Also Like

  • Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treats Skull Base Tumors: Part 2 of
  • Stereotactic Radiotherapy: A Growing Opportunity for Otolaryngologists: Part 1 of 2
  • Hearing Loss: A Modifiable Risk Factor for Dementia
  • Pills vs. Injections: Which Steroids Are Best for Sudden Hearing Loss?
Explore This Issue
May 2008

Factors Affecting Risk

The risk of hearing loss following stereotactic radiation depends partly on the radiation dose, said Dr. Young. We now use 12.5 Gy, he said.

Additionally, the better the patient’s hearing is prior to treatment, the better chance it will be preserved after radiosurgery, said Dr. Young.

The size of the tumor also plays a role in the risk of losing hearing, noted Dr. Bigelow. With radiation the best results occur with small tumors, he said.

Definition of ‘Loss’ Important

Risk of hearing deficits also depends on the definition of loss, said Dr. Coelho. For example, a drop of 1 decibel on pure tone average may result in a reclassification of hearing, depending on what scale is being used. Despite this drop, patients may continue to have serviceable hearing, he explained.

Likewise, preservation of hearing is a meaningless term if the pretreatment speech perception was poor, added Dr. Coelho. If there is no serviceable hearing to preserve, then losing it is not a risk. Critically analyzing the data and methodology used in reporting results is important.

He and his colleagues recently concluded that patients with acoustic neuromas less than 1.5 cm and no serviceable hearing, defined as word recognition score (WRS) of less than 50%, should receive surgical resection as the primary treatment if able to tolerate it, rather than stereotactic radiation. Their study of 57 patients, presented at the 2008 Triological Society Eastern Section meeting in January, found that surgery offered significantly better rates of disequilibrium and quality of life with respect to the patient’s disequilibrium.

General Contraindications

A number of factors might prohibit a clinician from recommending stereotactic radiation, noted Dr. Coelho. For example, a tumor larger than 3 cm can result in clinically significant postradiation acute edema, he said.

Dr. House generally does not use stereotactic radiation on patients with tumors larger than 2.5 cm, and in those with cystic tumors or with vestibular symptoms.

In addition, patients with disabling vertigo or imbalance generally do poorly following stereotactic radiation, said Dr. Coelho.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Medical Education, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus Tagged With: cancer, hearing loss, outcomes, patient communication, radiation, risk, surgery, treatment, tumorIssue: May 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treats Skull Base Tumors: Part 2 of
  • Stereotactic Radiotherapy: A Growing Opportunity for Otolaryngologists: Part 1 of 2
  • Hearing Loss: A Modifiable Risk Factor for Dementia
  • Pills vs. Injections: Which Steroids Are Best for Sudden Hearing Loss?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Where should ENT publications draw the line on authors' use of generative AI?

View Results

Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Rhinology’s Persistent Gender Gap
  • The Example We Set: Thoughts on the End of Residency Training
  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • ENTs Urged to Look Beyond Refractory Sinus Disease for Underlying Immune Deficiency
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • History of the Cochlear Implant
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • ENTs Urged to Look Beyond Refractory Sinus Disease for Underlying Immune Deficiency
    • When a “Blocked Ear” Isn’t Obstructive ETD
    • What Does It Mean to Be Written by a Human?
    • Reevaluating the CMS 90-Day CPAP Adherence Requirement: Persistent Use Among Early Nonadherent Patients
    • Vocal Outcomes After COVR in Porcine Bilateral Vocal Fold Resection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939