• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Study Shows Tislelizumab Boosts Survival in Patients with Previously Treated Esophageal Cancer

August 10, 2021

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

A study published in July 2021 in the Journal of Clinical Oncology has shown that the overall survival (OS) in patients who had previously treated esophageal cancer improved significantly with the humanized monoclonal antibody drug tislelizumab when compared to chemotherapy (J Clin Oncol. 2021 39:15_suppl, 4012-4012; the study was sponsored by BeiGene, Ltd.). 

You Might Also Like

  • Primary Radiation vs. Primary Surgical Therapy for Cervical Esophageal Cancer
  • Extensive Dataset for Esophageal Dilation Shows Very Low Rates of Complications, Mortality
  • High-Volume Hospitals, Surgeons Better Predictors of Overall Survival in Head, Neck Cancer
  • New Immunotherapy Improves Survival Rates in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

In the global phase 3 RATIONALE-302 trial (NCT03430843), 512 adult patients from 132 sites in 10 countries in Asia (n=404 patients) and in Europe and North America (n=108 patients) were randomized to either tislelizumab (n=256) or investigator-chosen standard chemotherapy (n=256). Patients had histologically confirmed advanced/unresectable or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma that progressed following prior systemic therapy with ≥1 evaluable lesion per RECIST v1.1 and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of ≤1. Of the 512 patients, 157 had visually estimated combined positive score (vCPS) of ≥10%. 

Tislelizumab was given to the tislelizumab group on day one and then every 21 days; the chemotherapy group received a combination of drugs: paclitaxel on day one and then every 21 days or on a weekly schedule, docetaxel on day one and then every 21 days, and irinotecan on days one and eight and then every 21 days. The study’s primary endpoint was overall survival in all randomized patients. Patients in both groups were treated with these protocols until their disease progressed, they showed unacceptable toxicity levels of any of the drugs, or they withdrew from the study. 

Results showed that tislelizumab clinically and significantly improved overall survival compared to chemotherapy in the intent-to-treat population (8.6 vs 6.3 months). Tislelizumab also showed significant improvement in overall survival compared to chemotherapy in patients with a vCPS of ≥10% (10.3 vs 6.8 months), as well as a higher overall response rate (20.3% vs 9.8%) and a more durable response (7.1 vs 4.0 months) 

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Online Exclusives Tagged With: clinical trials, head and neck cancer

You Might Also Like:

  • Primary Radiation vs. Primary Surgical Therapy for Cervical Esophageal Cancer
  • Extensive Dataset for Esophageal Dilation Shows Very Low Rates of Complications, Mortality
  • High-Volume Hospitals, Surgeons Better Predictors of Overall Survival in Head, Neck Cancer
  • New Immunotherapy Improves Survival Rates in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939