Cephalometric analysis. Measurements included (A) anterior midface height (nasion–subspinale), (B) posterior midface height (sella–posterior nasal spine), (C) palate length (subspinale–posterior nasal spine), and (D) sella–nasion distance. © 2019 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Cephalometric analysis. Measurements included (A) anterior midface height (nasion–subspinale), (B) posterior midface height (sella–posterior nasal spine), (C) palate length (subspinale–posterior nasal spine), and (D) sella–nasion distance. © 2019 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Cephalometric analysis. Measurements included (A) anterior midface height (nasion–subspinale), (B) posterior midface height (sella–posterior nasal spine), (C) palate length (subspinale–posterior nasal spine), and (D) sella–nasion distance.

© 2019 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

ENTtoday - https://www.enttoday.org/article/surgical-resection-of-pediatric-skull-base-tumors-expanded-endonasal-approaches-compare-well-with-traditional-transcranial-approaches/ent_0220_pg11a/