• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
    • History of Otolaryngology
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Voices of Leadership: Challenges Faced by Female Facial Plastic Surgeons and Considerations for Future Generations

by Pinky Sharma • July 1, 2026

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

CLINICAL QUESTION

What challenges do female facial plastic surgeons in leadership positions encounter, and what considerations may help support future generations of women leaders in the specialty?

You Might Also Like

  • Otolaryngology’s Gender Wage Gap
  • Second Opinions: Facial Nerve Paralysis
  • How to Create a Structured Otolaryngology Mentorship Program at the Residency Level
  • How Otolaryngology Can Address the Gender Gap
Explore This Issue
July 2026

BOTTOM LINE

Female facial plastic surgeons in leadership roles continue to face gender bias, impostor syndrome, mentorship burden, work–life imbalance, and institutional barriers despite increasing representation in surgery. The authors emphasize the importance of honest mentorship, structural change, purposeful leadership, and sustainable career models to support future generations of female surgeon leaders.

BACKGROUND: Women are increasingly entering surgical subspecialties and leadership positions in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery. Despite progress in gender equity, barriers persist in academic advancement, leadership development, compensation, mentorship expectations, and work–life integration. Understanding these experiences may help guide future institutional and cultural change within the specialty.

STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative thematic analysis of reflections from female facial plastic surgeons in national and institutional leadership positions regarding leadership challenges, mentorship, and future considerations for women in the field.

SETTING: Academic and national leadership environments within facial plastic and reconstructive surgery

SYNOPSIS: This viewpoint article synthesizes reflections from female facial plastic surgeons serving in leadership roles, including departmental vice chairs, division chiefs, residency and fellowship directors, medical directors, and presidents of national organizations. Several recurring themes emerged regarding challenges encountered throughout leadership development.

Participants described the persistent tension between assertiveness and likability, noting that women in surgery often feel pressure to display traditionally “masculine” leadership traits while simultaneously meeting societal expectations for warmth and emotional availability. Impostor syndrome and self-doubt were also frequently cited, particularly in academic settings and national meetings, where women may hesitate to pursue speaking or leadership opportunities despite qualifications.

Work–life imbalance represented another dominant theme. Respondents described competing demands from clinical practice, administration, research, mentorship, family responsibilities, and household labor, often accompanied by guilt and emotional exhaustion. Mentorship burden—or “mentorship tax”—was also emphasized, with relatively few senior women supporting growing numbers of female trainees and junior faculty, frequently without institutional recognition or compensation.

The authors additionally highlighted structural barriers within academic medicine, including productivity-based compensation systems, uncompensated leadership roles, and promotion models that may disadvantage women during childbearing years. Social media and evolving beauty standards were identified as emerging pressures unique to facial plastic surgery, influencing both patient expectations and surgeons’ personal branding responsibilities.

Despite these challenges, the surgeons emphasized leadership as deeply meaningful and purpose-driven, offering opportunities to influence institutional culture, advocate for equity, mentor future generations, and expand professional impact beyond operative care.

CITATION: Lyford-Pike S, et al. Voices of leadership: challenges faced by female facial plastic surgeons and considerations for future generations. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2026;28(1_suppl):6S-9S. doi:10.1177/26893614251394696.

COMMENT: This qualitative study of interviews with female facial plastic surgeons holding leadership positions offers incredible insights into challenges faced by female surgeons—not just facial plastic surgeons—and insights into how some of these challenges can be lessened as we move into the future. It is a must read for everyone!—Matthew Q. Miller, MD

Filed Under: Facial Plastic/Reconstructive, Literature Reviews Tagged With: Female Facial Plastic SurgeonsIssue: July 2026

You Might Also Like:

  • Otolaryngology’s Gender Wage Gap
  • Second Opinions: Facial Nerve Paralysis
  • How to Create a Structured Otolaryngology Mentorship Program at the Residency Level
  • How Otolaryngology Can Address the Gender Gap

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

How have you adopted advanced technologies in your practice?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Novel Treatments and Advances in OSA
    • The Reasons We Keep Going
    • Onboarding and Working with APPs
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • ENTtoday Wins 2026 APEX Award
    • AI-Powered Real-Time Multimodal Model for Predicting Recurrence and Survival in Head and Neck Cancer: A Multicenter, Multinational Study
    • Voices of Leadership: Challenges Faced by Female Facial Plastic Surgeons and Considerations for Future Generations
    • AI in the Diagnosis of Cholesteatoma: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence
    • Gender Identity Disparities in Early Adolescent Sleep: Findings from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939