• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Primary Radiation vs. Primary Surgical Therapy for Cervical Esophageal Cancer

by Amy Eckner • December 9, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What is the best initial therapy for patients requiring treatment of cervical esophageal cancer?

Background: Cancer of the cervical esophagus is infrequently encountered by the otolaryngologist; however, head and neck surgeons may be asked to collaborate with the treatment team providing care for these patients. Treatment has largely been surgical resection, radiation therapy, chemoradiation therapy, or a combination of the three. Surgical resection requires laryngectomy under most circumstances. The advantage of surgery is that after surgery, the stomach functions better over the long term than does the irradiated esophagus. Unfortunately, level one evidence is not available.

You Might Also Like

  • Fanconi Anemia Patients with HNSCC Tolerate Surgery Better than Radiation, Chemotherapy
  • Study: Surgery, Radiation Therapy Equally Effective in Treating OPSCC
  • Scoring System for Esophageal Cancer Requires Other Considerations
  • Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer Treatment by Multidisciplinary Palliative, Radiation, Oncology, and Surgical Teams
Explore This Issue
December 2014

Study design: Retrospective study.

Setting: The Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing.

Synopsis: During a 12-year period, 161 patients were encountered with cervical esophageal cancer. In this group, 133 received irradiation therapy alone, concurrent with chemotherapy, while 28 patients received radiation therapy (RT) followed by surgery. A separate group of 63 patients had surgery, sometimes followed by radiation therapy. This included 27 patients who received surgery alone and 36 patients who received surgery plus RT. Follow-up demonstrated similar rates of failure-free survival, including analysis of regional, distant, and overall survival.

Bottom line: In the absence of level one data, radiation therapy should be considered as primary intervention for patients with cancer of the cervical esophagus.

Citation: Cao CN, Luo JW, Gao L, et al. Primary radiotherapy compared with primary surgery in cervical esophageal cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;140:918-926.

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Head and Neck, Literature Reviews, Practice Focus Tagged With: esophageal cancer, radiationIssue: December 2014

You Might Also Like:

  • Fanconi Anemia Patients with HNSCC Tolerate Surgery Better than Radiation, Chemotherapy
  • Study: Surgery, Radiation Therapy Equally Effective in Treating OPSCC
  • Scoring System for Esophageal Cancer Requires Other Considerations
  • Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer Treatment by Multidisciplinary Palliative, Radiation, Oncology, and Surgical Teams

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939