• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Geometric Variables Can Help Predict Subglottic Stenosis Patients Who Need Surgical Intervention

by Amy Hamaker • May 9, 2016

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Can quantitative geometric measures and a computational fluid dynamic (CFD) model derived from medical imaging of children with subglottic stenosis (SGS) be effective diagnostic and treatment planning tools?

Background: Congenital SGS is identified when there is airway narrowing in the cricoid area without an endotracheal intubation history. Acquired SGS typically occurs in children with a previous intubation history, usually due to endotracheal tube trauma. A multidisciplinary care approach involves complex decision making from medical and surgical specialists. Computational 3D models could be used as a standardized, quantitative, predictive tool to estimate the effects of various medical and surgical interventions.

You Might Also Like

  • Drug-Eluting Endotracheal Tubes May Prevent Bacterial Inflammation in Patients with Subglottic Stenosis
  • Endoscopic Surgical Management of Subglottic Stenosis Still a Challenge
  • Bioabsorbable Miniplates for Subglottic Stenosis Are Safe and Effective
  • Remotely Reported Peak Flow Meter Measurements Demonstrate Disease Progression, Predict Need for Surgery in Patients with Subglottal Stenosis
Explore This Issue
May 2016

Study design: Retrospective chart and imaging review of computed tomography scans of 17 children with SGS in a tertiary care hospital from May 31, 2011, to November 7, 2013.

Synopsis: Four participants received surgical intervention, while 13 did not. All had geometric and CFD modeling, and 15 had polysomnograms completed. Study authors created the pediatric airway atlas (a compilation of airway geometries from radiographically normal children who received regional CT scans for reasons other than airway problems) in an effort to use population-based normative data for comparison to diseased subjects. Several geometric variables significantly distinguished those who received surgical intervention from those who did not: ASG (cross-sectional area of the subglottis), RASG (ratio of the cross-sectional area of the subglottis to the midtrachea); AS(ASG) (atlas score of the ASG), and the PR(ASG) (predicted percent relative reduction of the ASG). The two parameters most sensitive for discriminating the need for intervention were RASG and PR(ASG). PR(DSG) (predicted percent relative reduction of the hydraulic diameter of the subglottic airway) was most effective at discriminating intervention need. Statistically, sleep studies were poor discriminators for surgical intervention. Limitations included data representing a small, single-site, retrospective study; measurements that were performed in a static state; and potential selection bias.

Bottom line: Geometric and CFD variables were sensitive for determining which patients with SGS received surgical intervention.

Citation: Zdanski C, Davis S, Hong Y, et al. Quantitative assessment of the upper airway in infants and children with subglottic stenosis. Laryngoscope. 2016;126:1225-1231.

Filed Under: Laryngology, Literature Reviews Tagged With: subglottic stenosisIssue: May 2016

You Might Also Like:

  • Drug-Eluting Endotracheal Tubes May Prevent Bacterial Inflammation in Patients with Subglottic Stenosis
  • Endoscopic Surgical Management of Subglottic Stenosis Still a Challenge
  • Bioabsorbable Miniplates for Subglottic Stenosis Are Safe and Effective
  • Remotely Reported Peak Flow Meter Measurements Demonstrate Disease Progression, Predict Need for Surgery in Patients with Subglottal Stenosis

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you ever participated in a professional group's advocacy or Hill Day event?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Taking Otolaryngology Call in the ED and Hospital: Duty or Burden?
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Innovations in Otolaryngology: Two Paths to Progress
    • Disrupting Immigrant and Pediatric Care
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Society Debuts TRIO Leadership Academy
    • Innovations in Otolaryngology: Two Paths to Progress
    • How to Have Effective Presurgical Discussions
    • Advocacy: Finding Our Voice
    • A Royal Family Heritage: The Habsburg Jaw

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939