• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Balloon Sinuplasty Procedures Increased Dramatically from 2000 to 2014

by Amy E. Hamaker • September 24, 2017

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What sinus procedure trends are prominent from 2000 to 2014, particularly following the introduction of balloon sinuplasty (BSP) in the Common Procedural Technology (CPT) codes in 2011?

Bottom line
Although the total number of sinus procedures increased from 2000 to 2014, the number of BSPs increased at a substantially greater rate since the introduction of CPT codes. BSPs still account for the minority of sinus procedures nationwide, however, despite its increased utilization.

You Might Also Like

  • What Are Common Balloon Sinuplasty Complications?
  • Does Balloon Catheter Sinuplasty Have a Role in the Surgical Management of Pediatric Sinus Disease?
  • Dramatic Increase in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Since 2000
  • Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Rates Increase Since 2000
Explore This Issue
September 2017

Background: Balloon dilation used to treat rhinosinusitis was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2005. The BSP procedure is intended to shorten recovery time, keep the nasal mucosa intact, and minimize postoperative care. As such, it is considered minimally invasive, can be performed in the clinic under local anesthesia, and does not require bone or tissue cutting, unlike functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Furthermore, reimbursement amounts are approximately 10 times greater for BSP compared to FESS. However, there has been some concern about BSP overutilization.

Study design: Retrospective review of Medicare procedure and beneficiary billing data from 2000 to 2014 and provider data from 2012 to 2014; for comparison, data on septoplasty procedures from 2000 to 2014 were obtained.

Setting: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Synopsis: From 2000 to 2014, the total number of sinus procedures per 10 thousand beneficiaries (PP10K) nationwide increased from 17.2 to 26.2; sinus PP10K increased on average by 3.1% annually. From 2011 to 2014, the total non-balloon sinus procedures (nBSP) PP10K decreased from 21.9 to 19.9, with an average annual decrease of 3.1%. BSP PP10K increased from 1.6 in 2011 to 6.3 in 2014, with an average annual increase of 59%. Septoplasty PP10K changed modestly nationwide between 2000 and 2014, decreasing an average of 0.11% annually. By 2014, BSP accounted for 24.0% of sinus procedures nationwide. The percentage of BSP among all sinus procedures increased in all four U.S. census regions between 2012 and 2014 (West: 13.4% to 30.9%; Midwest: 17.2% to 32.9%; Northeast: 24.2% to 34.5%; South: 16.7% to 43.6%). States with the highest total BSPs from 2012 to 2014 were Texas (8,380), Florida (4,804), and California (3,897). Kansas (36.4), Texas (24.4), and Louisiana (24.2) had the highest total BSP PP10K from 2012 to 2014. There was a 244% increase in BSP-only providers, a 0.7% increase in nBSP-only providers, and an 83.3% increase in providers using both.

The national mean for three-year average Medicare payment amount per service was $1,647 for BSP and $353 for nBSP. The three states with the highest payment were Massachusetts ($2,270), New Jersey ($2,066), and Maryland ($2,053); the lowest were Nebraska ($617), South Carolina ($1,276), and West Virginia ($1,354). Limitations included a limited demographic, potential underrepresentation of FESS cases, and a lack of variables that could provide further insight into utilization patterns.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Practice Focus, Rhinology, Rhinology Tagged With: balloon sinuplastyIssue: September 2017

You Might Also Like:

  • What Are Common Balloon Sinuplasty Complications?
  • Does Balloon Catheter Sinuplasty Have a Role in the Surgical Management of Pediatric Sinus Disease?
  • Dramatic Increase in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Since 2000
  • Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Rates Increase Since 2000

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939