• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

High BMI a Significant Indicator of PPI Weaning Failure

by Amy E. Hamaker • January 7, 2018

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

How feasible is a 22-day proton pump inhibitor (PPI) weaning protocol in a cohort of patients following successful empiric treatment for suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD)?

Bottom line
Approximately 66% of patients who were on PPIs for LPRD were successfully weaned. High BMI was significantly predictive of failure to wean.

You Might Also Like

  • Weaning Patients Off of PPIs
  • Perioperative PPI Therapy Reduces Incidence of Pharyngocutaneous Fistula
  • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
  • Laryngologists v. Non-Laryngologist Treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
Explore This Issue
January 2018

Background: Many physicians prefer an empiric trial of PPI therapy as the first step in patients with symptoms suggestive of LPRD. However, PPIs are not without side effects, and the role of long-term versus short-term PPI therapy for LPRD is not known. A gradual wean is favored over abrupt discontinuation due to rebound gastric acid hypersecretion upon cessation of treatment.

Study design: Retrospective chart review of 35 patients.

Setting: University of Pittsburgh Voice Center, Division of Laryngology, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.

Synopsis: PPI weaning was offered patients after they experienced symptomatic relief from an empiric PPI trial, as reflected by a reduction in the reflux symptom index (RSI) scores. Weaning was not offered to those who experienced ongoing LPR-related symptoms. Before initiation of the wean protocol, the median duration of PPI therapy was 7.5 months for the unsuccessful wean group and 6.0 months for the successful wean group. Median duration of follow-up for the unsuccessful and successful wean groups was 13 months and 18 months, respectively.

The unsuccessful wean group had a significantly higher BMI compared to the successful wean group. BMI was found to be a significant negative predictor of successful PPI wean while adjusting for age, sex, PPI treatment duration, and PPI regime. PPI regime was not a significant predictor of successful PPI wean while controlling for age, sex, PPI treatment duration, and BMI. Limitations included the study’s retrospective design, a large variation in PPI-treatment duration and follow-up duration, and lack of assessment of patient compliance on recommended dietary and lifestyle practices for LPRD.

Citation: Lin RJ, Sridharan S, Smith LJ, Young VN, Rosen CA. Weaning of proton pump inhibitors in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux disease. Laryngoscope. 2018;128:133–137.

Filed Under: Laryngology, Literature Reviews Tagged With: BMI, clinical care, LPRD, outcomes, PPI, proton pump inhibitorIssue: January 2018

You Might Also Like:

  • Weaning Patients Off of PPIs
  • Perioperative PPI Therapy Reduces Incidence of Pharyngocutaneous Fistula
  • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
  • Laryngologists v. Non-Laryngologist Treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939