• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

PET/CT Alone Should Not Be Used to Exclude Tonsillar Cancer

by Amy E. Hamaker • January 7, 2019

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

You Might Also Like

  • Study Establishes SUVmax Cutoffs to Discriminate Benign and Malignant Lesions in the Palatine Tonsils
  • HN Cancer Patients with Negative Imaging History Derive Limited Benefit from Subsequent PET-CT
  • Survival for Advanced Head, Neck Cancer Improvements May Be Related to PET
  • PET Not Ready for Routine Management of Head and Neck Cancer
Explore This Issue
January 2019

Comment: Increased and asymmetric PET/CT FDG uptake in the tonsils is a frequent reason for referral to otolaryngology. However, it is unclear what uptake threshold should prompt biopsy. Certainly, we don’t want to miss primary tonsillar cancer; we also don’t want to perform unnecessary procedures. This small study showed that an SUVmax ratio between tonsils >1.6 (62% sensitive, 100% specific) is highly suspicious and warrants biopsy. They also note that malignant tonsils can have normal FDG uptake. Thus, PET/CT alone should not be used to exclude
cancer. —Jennifer Villwock, MD

What is the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) ratio between tonsils in patients with and without tonsillar carcinoma to determine useful diagnostic thresholds?

Bottom Line:
An SUVmax ratio between tonsils of ≥1.6 is highly suspicious for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and could be used to direct site of biopsy. Some malignant tonsils had normal FDG uptake; therefore, positron-emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) should not be used to exclude tonsillar cancer. Minor asymmetrical uptake is frequently seen in non-malignant tonsils and does not necessarily require further investigation.

Study design: Retrospective.

Summary: PET/CT examinations of patients with suspected head and neck SCC and controls from April 2013 to September 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. Tonsillar SUVmax ratios (ipsilateral/contralateral for malignant tonsils, maximum/minimum for patients without [controls]) were calculated and used to construct a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Twenty-five patients had tonsillar carcinoma (mean SUVmax ratio of 2, range 0.89–5.4) and 86 patients acted as controls (mean SUVmax ratio of 1.1, range 1–1.5). Using the ROC, the most accurate SUVmax ratio for identifying malignancy was >1.2 (77% sensitivity, 86% specificity). A potentially more clinically useful SUVmax ratio is ≥1.6 with 62% sensitivity and 100% specificity.

Citation: Pencharz D, Dunn J, Connor S, et al. Palatine tonsil SUVmax on FDG PET-CT as a discriminator between benign and malignant tonsils in patients with and without head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary. Clin Radiol. Published November 16, 2018 online ahead of print. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.10.007.

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Head and Neck, Literature Reviews, Practice Focus Tagged With: head and neck cancer, PET-CT, tonsillar cancerIssue: January 2019

You Might Also Like:

  • Study Establishes SUVmax Cutoffs to Discriminate Benign and Malignant Lesions in the Palatine Tonsils
  • HN Cancer Patients with Negative Imaging History Derive Limited Benefit from Subsequent PET-CT
  • Survival for Advanced Head, Neck Cancer Improvements May Be Related to PET
  • PET Not Ready for Routine Management of Head and Neck Cancer

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939