• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Will Otolaryngology Match Numbers Continue to Rise?

by Amy E. Hamaker • February 7, 2020

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Match Day can be a tense time for medical students waiting to know where they’ll spend the next two years of their lives. But over the last few years, the match has caused anxiety for otolaryngology as well, as the number of applicants versus the number of residency slots has swung pendulum-style between having too many applicants to having too few.

You Might Also Like

  • Is There a Crisis in the Otolaryngology Match?
  • Letter from the Editor: How We Can Improve the Otolaryngology Residency Selection Process
  • What Happens to Medical Students Who Don’t Match?
  • How Residency Programs and Students Coped With Virtual Match Day
Explore This Issue
February 2020

After a peak in 2014, the number of applicants to otolaryngology remained fairly stable until 2016, when it dropped precipitously, according to the National Resident Matching Program. Even so, only two residency spots that year went unfilled prior to the Supplemental Offer and Acceptance Program (SOAP). In 2017, the number of ranked U.S. seniors who applied to the specialty (303) fell below the actual number of available positions (305), and 14 spots went unfilled after the initial match. In the 2018 match, the numbers weren’t much better: The number of ranked U.S. seniors (284) again fell below the actual number of available positions (315). 

This changed in 2019 when a total of 398 U.S. seniors applied for 328 otolaryngology positions. Indications from the 2020 match show that the pendulum has swung up again, with the number of applications per applicant climbing steeply. Otolaryngology applicants put in an average of 72 applications each, according to David Chang, MD, residency program director for the department of otolaryngology–head and neck surgery at the University of Missouri in Columbia, who has examined the otolaryngology match numbers in depth over the last five years.

© Africa Studio / shutterstock.com

© Africa Studio / shutterstock.com

“For a couple of years, we came dangerously close to the number of applicants being near to the number of slots,” said Michael G. Stewart, MD, professor and chairman of otolaryngology–head and neck surgery at Weill Cornell Medical College/NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital. “But the numbers have gone back up, and by a lot. For our four slots, two years ago my program received 275 applications. This year we received 405.”

Many believe the reason behind this year’s influx is perceived competition to garner enough interviews to ensure a match. “Match 2020 is very competitive. We received 454 applications this season for four positions,” said Cristina Cabrera-Muffly, MD, associate residency program director and associate professor of otolaryngology at the University of Colorado in Aurora. “If a student is going to spend money on medical school, then spending a bit more to apply to more programs during the match really isn’t a disincentive.”

Mona M. Abaza, MD, MS, professor of otolaryngology at the University of Colorado in Aurora, said she believes an additional factor in the higher application numbers is the completion of the single accreditation process with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). “Last year was the first year that all of the osteopathic residency programs in the country, in every specialty, were accredited under the ACGME and in a single match rather than in their own separate match,” she explained. “There are some osteopathic programs that have been rolled into the otolaryngology total, but I’m certain that the single match has increased the numbers of applicants.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Home Slider Tagged With: medical residents, medical students, otolaryngologyIssue: February 2020

You Might Also Like:

  • Is There a Crisis in the Otolaryngology Match?
  • Letter from the Editor: How We Can Improve the Otolaryngology Residency Selection Process
  • What Happens to Medical Students Who Don’t Match?
  • How Residency Programs and Students Coped With Virtual Match Day

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939