• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Public Demand for Unproven COVID-19 Therapies Soars with High-Profile Endorsements

by Linda Kossoff • July 16, 2020

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

How have high-profile endorsements of the unproven COVID-19 drug therapies chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine affected
the scope of public demand for them?

Bottom Line: Broad amplification of accurate information is essential to counteract the massive increase in demand for unproven and potentially hazardous COVID-19 treatments prompted by high-profile endorsements.

You Might Also Like

  • AMA Adopts Policy to Combat Public Health Disinformation by Healthcare Professionals
  • The End of the Public Health Emergency: What It Means for Telehealth
  • COVID-19 Associated with Upsurge in Otolaryngology Publications
  • Smell and Taste Disorder Differences Seen Between Long-Term COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 Patients
Explore This Issue
July 2020

Commentary: “This paper describes the frequency of internet searches for unproven COVID-19 therapies in the U.S. It highlights why we, physicians and members of the healthcare workforce, cannot simply shrug off lay press headlines that we know from our training are probably not rooted in strong evidence. As the authors state, the endorsement of questionable therapeutics by high-profile individuals can draw ’massive public attention that could shape individual decision-making.’ Indeed, the web searching and overall demand for chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine substantially increased following such endorsements, compounded by the fact that chloroquine-containing compounds are available for sale online. Our patients are likely familiar with these headlines too. We must be equipped to answer their questions.” —Jennifer A. Villwock, MD

Background: Although there are no highly effective prescription drug therapies supported by reliable evidence for COVID-19, high-profile figures have endorsed the anti-malarial chloroquine, and the lupus and rheumatoid arthritis treatment hydroxychloroquine, to treat the virus. Both of these therapies have potential cardiovascular toxic effects, and can be confused with toxic, commercially available products containing chloroquine.

Study design: Internet search analysis.

Setting: The Center for Data Driven Health, Qualcomm Institute, University of California, San Diego, Calif.

Synopsis: Researchers examined daily Google searches originating from the United States from Feb. 1, 2020, to March 29, 2020, that included the terms buy, order, Amazon, eBay, or Walmart in combination with chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine. They evaluated two post-periods of interest: 1) all days after March 16, when entrepreneur Elon Musk endorsed the drugs, including President Donald Trump’s endorsement on March 19; and 2) all days after March 22, when reports on chloroquine-related poisonings were published. Researchers calculated query fraction per a total of 10 million searches to purchase chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine. The first and largest spikes corresponded with Musk’s tweet and Trump’s first televised endorsements, respectively. Searches remained substantially above expected levels following news reports of poisoning. Additional surveillance will clarify findings, including estimating the number of sales of chloroquine-containing products. Results indicate that drug endorsements made prior to conclusive studies of efficacy can lead to unsupervised product use and negative health consequences for people who take them. Moreover, medication hoarding may create shortages for people who need them for legitimate purposes.

Citation: Liu M, Caputi TL, Dredze M, et al. Internet searches for unproven COVID-19 therapies in the United States [published online ahead of print April 29, 2020]. JAMA Intern Med. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1764.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews Tagged With: COVID19Issue: July 2020

You Might Also Like:

  • AMA Adopts Policy to Combat Public Health Disinformation by Healthcare Professionals
  • The End of the Public Health Emergency: What It Means for Telehealth
  • COVID-19 Associated with Upsurge in Otolaryngology Publications
  • Smell and Taste Disorder Differences Seen Between Long-Term COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 Patients

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939