• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Biologics Shown Effective in Real-World Setting for Managing Patients with Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps

by Linda Kossof • March 7, 2025

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

CLINICAL QUESTION

How do the clinical effects and response times of dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab compare when treating patients with severe, uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP)?

You Might Also Like

  • Are New Biologics a Game Changer for Treating Nasal Polyposis?
  • What Otolaryngologists Need to Know about Biologics and Allergic Rhinitis
  • Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Superior to Two of Three Biologics in Treating Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps
  • Biologics For Chronic Rhinosinusitis: How And When To Use Them For The Best Response
Explore This Issue
March 2025

BOTTOM LINE

Dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab significantly improve quality of life and reduce nasal polyp size in patients with CRSwNP, with dupilumab showing the fastest response.

BACKGROUND: Recent advances have led to a classification of CRS based on immunopathological profiles. Biologic agents targeting type 2 inflammation, the most common form of CRSwNP in Western populations, have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of severe, uncontrolled CRSwNP. Selecting appropriate patients, biologics, and timing is crucial to providing personalized, cost-effective care, however.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study

SETTING: ENT Department, SS. Annunziata Hospital, Cosenza, Italy

SYNOPSIS: Researchers studied 33 patients (18 men; mean age 44.69 years) with severe uncontrolled CRSwNP treated between April and December 2023. Patients self-administered one of three biologics: dupilumab (n=14), omalizumab (n=11), or mepolizumab (n=8). Outcomes were assessed by SNOT-22 for quality of life, nasal polyp score (NPS) for polyp size, and Sniffin’ Sticks-12 for olfactory function, comparing differences from baseline to four weeks, three, six, and nine months. Another primary objective was to investigate whether monoclonal antibodies could improve olfactory functions. All three groups showed similarly significant improvements in SNOT-22 scores from baseline to nine months. Overall, 57.6% and 81% of patients had a good/excellent response at six and nine months, respectively. Dupilumab showed the most rapid improvement in NPS from four weeks onward, whereas omalizumab and mepolizumab showed significant NPS reductions by six months. The dupilumab group showed a notable decrease in anosmic patients (64.3% to 28.6% at nine months). Asthma control improved across all groups. The absence of allergic rhinitis was strongly associated with a reduced likelihood of control at six months, indicating that the shared underlying immune pathway of type 2 inflammation contributes to both conditions. Study limitations included its retrospective nature.

CITATION: De Santis S, et al. Clinical effects and response time of biological drugs in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps patients: real-life experience. Laryngoscope. 2024. doi: 10.1002/lary.31948.  

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Practice Focus, Rhinology, Rhinology Tagged With: CRSwNP, nasal polyps, rhinology, Severe Chronic RhinosinusitisIssue: March 2025

You Might Also Like:

  • Are New Biologics a Game Changer for Treating Nasal Polyposis?
  • What Otolaryngologists Need to Know about Biologics and Allergic Rhinitis
  • Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Superior to Two of Three Biologics in Treating Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps
  • Biologics For Chronic Rhinosinusitis: How And When To Use Them For The Best Response

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939