• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

The Rise of Drug Innovation in China—Implications for Global Access

by Pinky Sharma • November 4, 2025

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

CLINICAL QUESTION

You Might Also Like

  • When It Comes to Drug Development, What Do Our Dollars Buy?
  • Drug Shortages in Otolaryngology
  • Rising Drug Costs Create Concern About Drug Diversions
  • AMA’s Opt-Out Provision for Sale of Physician Prescribing Data Seen as First Step
Explore This Issue
November 2025

How is China’s growing role in pharmaceutical innovation shaping global drug access? What are the implications for U.S. patients and policymakers?

BOTTOM LINE

China has rapidly expanded from a supplier of generics to a major innovator, with first-in-China approvals rising from nine in 2018 to 45 in 2024. This growth creates opportunities for global patient access, but U.S. regulatory skepticism, trade frictions, and data integrity concerns complicate adoption. Collaboration and stable trade will be critical to ensure access without compromising standards.

BACKGROUND: China has long dominated the global supply of generics and active pharmaceutical ingredients. Since 2015, a combination of rising research and development (R&D) investment, international partnerships, and regulatory reforms—such as expedited clinical trial reviews and conditional approval pathways—has accelerated domestic drug innovation. The country now rivals Western nations in novel drug development, but tensions with the U.S. raise concerns about supply chains, tariffs, and patient access.

STUDY DESIGN: Perspective article reviewing regulatory, economic, and geopolitical drivers of Chinese pharmaceutical innovation, and implications for U.S. and global markets.

SETTING: Analysis of Chinese drug development trends, U.S. regulatory actions, and international trade policies, with examples of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) approvals of Chinese-developed drugs.

SYNOPSIS: The number of drugs first approved in China rose from nine in 2018 to 45 in 2024, 40 of which were developed domestically. Several drugs have shown major clinical impact, including zanubrutinib (superior to ibrutinib in chronic lymphocytic leukemia) and ivonescimab (a dual PD-1/VEGF antibody outperforming pembrolizumab in lung cancer). Yet U.S. regulators have sometimes rejected Chinese products, citing limited generalizability (as with sintilimab in 2022) or data integrity concerns. R&D spending reached $497 billion in 2024, and regulatory reforms have shortened approval timelines. At the same time, U.S. trade frictions such as tariff threats and the proposed BIOSECURE Act threaten access to drugs. The authors therefore recommend: (1) strengthened Chinese compliance with international data and manufacturing standards, (2) greater regulatory collaboration (e.g., adding China to the FDA’s Project Orbis for oncology drugs), and (3) stable trade policies to safeguard patient access. Certain challenges remain, however, including geopolitical tensions, FDA concerns over trial generalizability, and inconsistent enforcement of Chinese regulatory standards. Nonetheless, China’s rise presents both risks and opportunities for global drug access, particularly in oncology, where it accounts for ~25% of global cases.

CITATION: Vokinger KN, et al. The rise of drug innovation in China – implications for patient access in the United States and globally. N Engl J Med. 2025;393:839-841. doi: 10.1056/ NEJMp2505821.

COMMENT: China is emerging as a global leader in pharmaceutical innovation, with the number of drugs first approved in China rising sharply in recent years. Many of these are first in class or superior to other treatments. This article discusses potential collaborations with U.S. groups, as well as concerns about trial, generalizability, data integrity, and manufacturing standards.—Matthew Naunheim, MD, MBA

Filed Under: Laryngology, Laryngology, Literature Reviews, Practice Focus Tagged With: drug innovations in ChinaIssue: November 2025

You Might Also Like:

  • When It Comes to Drug Development, What Do Our Dollars Buy?
  • Drug Shortages in Otolaryngology
  • Rising Drug Costs Create Concern About Drug Diversions
  • AMA’s Opt-Out Provision for Sale of Physician Prescribing Data Seen as First Step

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you served as an expert witness in a case that’s gone to trial?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
  • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
    • Composition and Priorities of Multidisciplinary Pediatric Thyroid Programs: A Consensus Statement
    • Artificial Intelligence as Author: Can Scientific Reviewers Recognize GPT- 4o–Generated Manuscripts?
    • Self-Administered Taste Testing Without Water: Normative Data for the 53-Item WETT
    • Long-Term Particulate Matter Exposure May Increase Risk of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis: Results from an Exposure-Matched Study

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939