• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

US Needs to Rethink Spending for Chronic Illnesses, Dartmouth Study Says

by Margot Fromer • September 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

A new study from Dartmouth Medical School documents “staggering variations in how hospitals care for chronically ill elderly patients.” The study points to problems with quality and faults Medicare for unnecessary spending. It goes on to say that less use of acute care hospitals and fewer physician visits could lead to better results for patients.

You Might Also Like

  • Medicare Battle Heats Up: Geographic Disparities spark look into spending variation
  • A Look at National Health Spending
  • Dartmouth Atlas Takes Aim at Excess Utilization of Medical Resources
  • IPAB is Medicare’s New Hammer for Spending Accountability
Explore This Issue
September 2006

The study was done at Dartmouth’s Center for Evaluative Clinical Services under the direction of John E. Wennberg, MD, MPH. He said that three issues drive differences in cost and quality of care: an unmanageable supply of resources; limited evidence about what kinds of care really benefit the chronically ill; and falsely optimistic assumptions about conditions that cannot be cured.

The Numbers

The study looked at the records of 4.7 million Medicare enrollees who died of chronic disease between 2000 and 2003. The researchers came to the conclusion that Medicare could have saved $40 billion if all hospitals practiced the high-quality, low-cost standard set by the Salt Lake City region. It also found that hospitals that treat patients more intensively and spent more Medicare money did not get better results. In fact, regions with the best quality and outcomes used the fewest resources: Rochester, Minn., and Portland, Ore., in addition to Salt Lake City, Utah. Patients there are admitted less frequently to hospitals, spend less time in an ICU, and see fewer specialists.

“This excessive and misplaced use of resources is only one manifestation of a totally chaotic health-care system.” – —Alfred Munzer, MD

The variation among academic medical centers for the average number of hospital days during the last six months of life ranged from 12.9 days at St. Mary’s Hospital in Rochester, MN, to 23.9 days at New York Presbyterian Hospital. The University of California–Los Angeles had the highest number of ICU days at 11.4—3.5 times higher than University of California-San Francisco (3.3 days). Medicare enrollees at New York University Medical Center had the most physician visits (76.2), the Robert Wood Johnson Hospital in New Brunswick, NJ, had the next most (57.7). At the University of Kentucky in Lexington there were only 18.6 physician visits.

Dr. Wennberg said that resources per capita devoted to managing chronic illness are increasing steadily each year—13.6% more ICU beds in 2003 than in 2000, 13.4% more for medical specialists, and 7.7% more for primary physicians. Acceleration was greatest in regions already using the most care.

Causes of the Trends

Medicare and other payers are part of the driving force behind the increases. “They encourage overuse of acute care hospital services and proliferation of medical specialists. The care of people with chronic illness accounts for more than 75% of US health-care expenditures, indicating that overuse and overspending is more than a Medicare problem,” said the report.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy, Practice Management Tagged With: chronic illness, healthcare reform, Medicare, policy, Quality, spending, treatmentIssue: September 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • Medicare Battle Heats Up: Geographic Disparities spark look into spending variation
  • A Look at National Health Spending
  • Dartmouth Atlas Takes Aim at Excess Utilization of Medical Resources
  • IPAB is Medicare’s New Hammer for Spending Accountability

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939