• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Sensory Testing of Swallowing Reflex Expands Diagnostic and Treatment Potential

by Henkel, Gretchen • December 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Until 1980, the primary technique for assessing patients with dysphagia was the modified barium swallow (MBS). It was then that fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing was added to the diagnostic armamentarium. In the 1990s, flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST) added additional options, offering superior technology to assess both bolus transport and airway protection without the radiation exposure that accompanies the MBS. Jonathan E. Aviv, MD, Professor of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Director of the Division of Laryngology, and Medical Director of the Voice and Swallowing Center at Columbia University Medical Center in New York, developed FEESST and is an expert consultant for Medtronic and Vision Sciences. The technique, he said, “expands the diagnostic options—and hence, the therapeutic options—available to patients who present with throat complaints, including cough.”

You Might Also Like

  • Laryngeal Adductor Reflex Responses to Varying Stimulation Forces Assesses Sensory Dysfunction in Laryngopharyngeal Disorders
  • Pregabalin Shows Promise as Treatment Option for Laryngeal Sensory Neuropathy
  • Diagnosis, Treatment of Swallowing Disorders Require Focused Evaluation by Otolaryngologists
  • Pretreatment Swallowing Assessment in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
Explore This Issue
December 2007

Due to its sensory testing component, FEESST captures more complete information on the swallowing mechanism in a wide range of patients. “Without using sensory testing, we have to infer information based on pooling of secretions or how patients respond to our touching them with the tip of the scope in the larynx or pharynx,” explained speech and language pathologist Lori M. Burkhead, PhD, Assistant Professor in the Department of Otolaryngology at the Medical College of Georgia in Augusta. “FEESST gives us a more objective, quantifiable measurement not only for clinical procedures and clinical information, but also for our research endeavors.”

Quantifying the range of laryngeal sensory deficits is especially important in patients with neurological disorders. It is well known that stroke patients are at high risk for aspiration pneumonia, a leading cause of death following stroke. Many studies have now established the technique’s efficacy in the diagnosis and management of patients who are at risk for aspiration;1,2 a few investigators have also shown the procedure to be safe in children.3

Performing FEESST

In addition to eliminating radiation exposure and the risk of barium aspiration, FEESST’s other advantages include its portability. It is regularly performed in physicians’ offices, clinics, and at the bedside in skilled nursing facilities and nursing homes and even in the ICU. Just prior to performing FEESST, the clinician completes a 30-second calibration with a portable computer and video monitor. He or she then passes an endoscope, which incorporates a sensory stimulator, through the nose and into the oropharynx. The video monitor allows the endoscopist to visually assess velopharyngeal closure, anatomy of the base of the tongue and hypopharynx, abduction and adduction of the vocal folds, status of the pharyngeal musculature, and the patient’s ability to handle his or her own secretions.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Laryngology Issue: December 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Laryngeal Adductor Reflex Responses to Varying Stimulation Forces Assesses Sensory Dysfunction in Laryngopharyngeal Disorders
  • Pregabalin Shows Promise as Treatment Option for Laryngeal Sensory Neuropathy
  • Diagnosis, Treatment of Swallowing Disorders Require Focused Evaluation by Otolaryngologists
  • Pretreatment Swallowing Assessment in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939