• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Salvage Surgery Shows More Prosthesis-Related Complications

by Thomas R. Collins • September 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

PHOENIX-Performing salvage surgery after chemoradiation or radiation treatment for laryngeal cancer patients, rather than just performing primary surgery right away, appears to lead to more complications with patients’ tracheoesophageal voice prostheses, according to a retrospective study reported by researchers here.

You Might Also Like

  • Elective Neck Dissection Indicated in Patients Undergoing Salvage Laryngectomy
  • What Is the Role of Flap Reconstruction in Salvage Total Laryngectomy?
  • Onlay Prophylactic Flaps Help Reduce Fistula Incidence after STL
  • Caution Regarding Elective Neck Dissection During Salvage Surgery
Explore This Issue
September 2009

Patients who were first treated either with radiotherapy or chemoradiation, then had salvage surgery performed later, had significantly more leakage around their prostheses, among other problems, than those who had primary surgery performed, researchers from Johns Hopkins University found during an examination of all the total laryngectomies performed at the Johns Hopkins Medical Center from 1998 to 2008.

Figure. Speech-language pathologist Heather Starmer, MA, checks on a patient being treated for laryngeal cancer.

click for large version
Figure. Speech-language pathologist Heather Starmer, MA, checks on a patient being treated for laryngeal cancer.

When we looked at the number of leaks around the voice prostheses, we did find a significant difference between the groups, said Heather Starmer, MA, a speech-language pathologist who presented the findings at the American Head and Neck Society Meeting, conducted as part of the Combined Otolaryngology Spring Meeting.

A movement away from the practice of having a total laryngectomy, and then radiation therapy, prompted the study, Ms. Starmer said. For many years, the primary treatment for patients who had end-stage laryngeal cancer was total laryngectomy followed by radiation therapy, she said.

Then the tide started to change.

The Rise of Chemoradiation

In a 2006 study of the National Cancer Database, Chen et al. found that, from 1985 to 2001, use of chemoradiation as primary treatment for advanced cancer of the larynx increased from 8.3% to 20.8%. In another 2006 study of the same database, Hoffman et al. found that primary chemoradiation for all cancer of the larynx increased from 2% to 13.2%.

Studies on the effectiveness of chemoradiotherapy seem to have fueled the change in strategy.

The 1994 Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study Group concluded that 64% of patients getting induction chemotherapy and definitive radiation therapy had retained their larynx after two years, with no decrement in two-year survival, compared with patients receiving a total laryngectomy.

The 2003 RTOG 91-11 study concluded that patients getting chemoradiation had significantly better laryngeal preservation than patients getting either just radiotherapy or induction chemoradiation therapy and then radiotherapy.

There has been a real change toward chemoradiation for treatment of these patients, Ms. Starmer said. At the same time period when we’ve seen this change in practice, we’ve also started to see, clinically, patients having an increased number of complications regarding tracheoesophageal voice prostheses [TEP], she continued. And so the question that we posed was: Could the problems that we’re seeing clinically be related to salvage surgery in comparison to the patients having primary surgery?

Heather Starmer, MAThe question that we posed was: Could the problems that we’re seeing clinically be related to salvage surgery in comparison to the patients having primary surgery?
-Heather Starmer, MA

The Hopkins Study

A total of 174 patients were included in the Johns Hopkins analysis, including 81 who had primary surgery performed, 61 who had primary radiotherapy, and 32 who had primary chemoradiotherapy. Those who did not receive complete oncologic treatment, those who didn’t receive follow-up TEP care at Johns Hopkins, and those with a follow-up period of less than six months were excluded from the study.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Head and Neck, Laryngology, Practice Management Tagged With: chemoradiation, head and neck cancer, head and neck surgery, salvage laryngectomyIssue: September 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • Elective Neck Dissection Indicated in Patients Undergoing Salvage Laryngectomy
  • What Is the Role of Flap Reconstruction in Salvage Total Laryngectomy?
  • Onlay Prophylactic Flaps Help Reduce Fistula Incidence after STL
  • Caution Regarding Elective Neck Dissection During Salvage Surgery

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939