• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Not So Fast: New quality provisions aren’t ready for implementation, medical groups say

by Geri Aston • June 9, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The new health system reform law includes a number of quality provisions that physician organizations say are not ready for primetime and won’t be ready in the time frame established by Congress.

You Might Also Like

  • Time to Comply with Physician Quality Reporting System Is Now
  • Get Ready for Quality Improvement: Panelists outline helpful metrics and more
  • Medicare Approves New Measure Groups in PQRS for Otolaryngology
  • Health Reform to Insure 32 Million: Are you ready for them?
Explore This Issue
June 2010

The two sections of most concern to medical associations involve the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) and the creation of a value-based payment modifier under the Medicare physician fee schedule.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act not only extends PQRI through 2014, but, starting in 2015, it also institutes payment penalties for physicians who don’t report quality measures. The incentive payment for participating in the program drops from 2 percent this year to 1 percent in 2011 and 0.5 percent from 2012 to 2014. The penalty will be 1.5 percent in 2015 and 2 percent in subsequent years.

Physician groups argue that PQRI, now in its fourth reporting year, still has problems and shouldn’t become punitive until it is run properly.

“The doctors who participated in this, to my knowledge, have a difficult time getting their payments,” said Gerald Healy, MD, FACS, professor of otology and laryngology at Harvard Medical School and a former president of the American College of Surgeons. “The credibility of the program is under serious question among otolaryngologists because of prior poor experience.”

Gerald Healy, MD, FACS“The credibility of the program is under serious question among otolaryngologists because of prior poor experience.”

—Gerald Healy, MD, FACS

Robert Bennett, government affairs representative for the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA), said the MGMA recently discovered that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) found that analytical errors were made in determining which physicians successfully reported measures in 2008.

CMS is now making additional payments to some practices, he said. “The frustrating thing is that Congress has passed a law that makes the program punitive in 2015, and you have a situation where the Medicare agency is still trying to properly implement the second year of reporting,” Bennett said. “We have grave concerns that this program is just not ready for any sort of penalty.”

According to an MGMA survey published in January, nearly 50 percent of physicians found it difficult or very difficult to capture and submit PQRI data last year, compared with 31 percent who found it easy or very easy. When asked if the two percent payment provides enough incentive to begin or continue PQRI participation, respondents were almost evenly split, with 45 percent saying ‘yes’ and 42 percent responding ‘no.’

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Articles, Features, Health Policy Issue: June 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • Time to Comply with Physician Quality Reporting System Is Now
  • Get Ready for Quality Improvement: Panelists outline helpful metrics and more
  • Medicare Approves New Measure Groups in PQRS for Otolaryngology
  • Health Reform to Insure 32 Million: Are you ready for them?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939