• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

A Look at National Health Spending

by Marlene Piturro, PhD, MBA • April 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Dr. Gianoli also pointed out that patients with a minimal $5 co-pay or even less for an office visit have no financial incentive to handle minor medical issues on their own. That creates virtually unlimited demand for physician services, leading to higher volumes of patient visits. As for the apparent increase of intensity of services rendered, he said that electronic medical records enable medical offices to automatically upcode, thereby taking advantage of higher reimbursement rates. The reality is that intensity is probably down because we can do less in a 10 minute than a 30 minute patient visit, he added. The system is so out of whack that physicians are not rewarded for performing optimal treatment (see box, left).

You Might Also Like

  • IPAB is Medicare’s New Hammer for Spending Accountability
  • US Needs to Rethink Spending for Chronic Illnesses, Dartmouth Study Says
  • Medicare Battle Heats Up: Geographic Disparities spark look into spending variation
  • A Myth of Modern Medicine: ‘There are 40 million Americans with No Access to Health Care’
Explore This Issue
April 2006

Good news for the US economy as a whole, prescription drug spending continued to decelerate in 2004, increasing only 8.2% versus 10.2% in 2003-the first single-digit growth in pharmacy spending in 10 years. A number of factors including rapid growth in prescribing lower-priced generic drugs, increased use of OTC anti-ulcerants and antihistamines, a move toward more mail order dispensing (up 13.6% versus 2% growth in retail pharmacy), and more refined tiered co-pay systems accounted for the slowdown.

Since Medicare and other insurance plans fix physician reimbursement, doctors can’t charge more money. And since there’s only so much time in a day, instead of seeing ten patients they’ll see twenty to maintain income levels. – Gerard Gianoli, MD

In addition, health plans increased incentives for consumers to use both generics and OTC drugs-lower co-pays for retail and mail order pharmacy, coupons, and not covering certain brand-name drugs. Physicians should weigh the impact of these measures on patients’ pocketbooks; generic co-pays, while smaller in absolute cost than those for brand name drugs, sometimes result in higher out-of-pocket costs. In contrast to an overall decrease in health spending growth, out-of-pocket drug spending outpaced private health insurance spending growth in 2003 and 2004 (9.4% and 7.1%, respectively.)

Institutions

Payments to home health agencies rose more rapidly than any other institutional category, 11.1% in 2003 and 13.3% in 2004, to $43.2 billion. Medicare spending for home care jumped 19.3% in 2004, impelled mostly by rapid growth of hospice care delivered at home.

Spending rose for hospitals at a higher rate than the overall 7.9% for all health-care spending. Hospital spending of $570.8 billion accounted for about one-third of total costs in 2004. It rose 9.5% for private insurers and 9.9 % for Medicaid. High compensation costs, fueled by higher wages for nurses and higher professional liability costs, were the key drivers of this uptick. Hospital volume was flat considering the growing US population, with growth in admissions and outpatient visits of only 1.2%, down from 2.4% between 2001 and 2003.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy, Medical Education Tagged With: costs, healthcare reform, insurance, Medicare, outcomes, policy, reimbursement, spendingIssue: April 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • IPAB is Medicare’s New Hammer for Spending Accountability
  • US Needs to Rethink Spending for Chronic Illnesses, Dartmouth Study Says
  • Medicare Battle Heats Up: Geographic Disparities spark look into spending variation
  • A Myth of Modern Medicine: ‘There are 40 million Americans with No Access to Health Care’

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939