• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

ACGME Revises Cap on Resident Work Hours

by Richard Quinn • August 9, 2017

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

First to consider is the paramount importance placed on patient care. “Following through with a patient from when you might meet them to how you make a diagnosis to subsequently initiating some sort of treatment is important, obviously, for the patient,” said Dr. Vasan. “But it’s just as important for the physician who is learning how to manage these patients.”

You Might Also Like

  • ACGME Revises Cap on Resident Work Hours
  • Resident Restructure: Attendings adjust to new work-hour rules
  • What Is the Effect of ACGME Duty Hours Regulations?
  • Otolaryngologists View Resident Work-Hour Restrictions: ACS calls for in-depth investigation before mandating further restrictions

Second, patient care is helped along when staff are able to reduce the number of hand-offs and transitions of care. Limiting one member of a team to an hours limit to which others don’t have to adhere to opens the door to a problem in transferring information. “If you were to have frequent handovers, there’s potential for error,” Dr. Vasan added. “That’s why companies now exist that utilize software as a means to minimize errors and to make sure that everyone’s on the same page. This is something new that has been created because of work-hour restrictions.”

Dr. Zetterman said there is one major study that looked at hours limits and their impact on patient outcomes. The review, which was published in The New England Journal of Medicine in February 2016 and involved 117 U.S. general surgery residency programs and 151 hospitals, found that longer shifts and less time off between shifts were not associated with an increased rate of death or serious complications (9.1% in the flexible-policy group and 9.0% in the standard-policy group) or of any secondary postoperative outcomes studied (N Engl J Med. 2016;374:713-727). “That was certainly an added factor,” Dr. Zetterman said.

The third leg of the proverbial stool that is continuity of care is the health of physicians themselves, Dr. Vasan said. To wit, the NEJM surgical study found “no significant difference in residents’ satisfaction with overall well-being and education quality.”

“That’s one of the things the ACGME stresses, that physicians receive education in terms of recognizing fatigue and fatigue mitigation,” Dr. Vasan added. “It is important for physicians to have an opportunity to rest; that goes hand-in-hand with having these doctors work potentially 24 hours now.”

Dr. Rodney said that the 16-hour limit on interns meant that they could work a few of those shifts in a row, which could be more dangerous for them. “Sixteen hours on paper looks better than 24, but working 16 hours day after day instead of 24 hours with a post-call day off does not result in better quality of life,” she said, “and may actually lead to worse quality of life for the resident.”

Maintaining a Balance

Dr. Zetterman emphasized that while first-year otolaryngology residents and their program directors may be focused on raising the hours cap, the newly unveiled revision to the ACGME Common Program Requirements, the formal name of the rules that govern residents, is much broader. The five-year review placed a greater emphasis on patient safety and quality improvement, added a section to address the critical importance of physician well-being to graduate medical education and patient care, and implemented more explicit requirements regarding team-based care and professionalism, coupled with a framework for clinical and educational work hours that allows for flexibility, with a maximum that aims toward the ultimate goals of physician education and patient care (available at acgmecommon.org).

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Resident Focus Tagged With: career, residents, work hours

You Might Also Like:

  • ACGME Revises Cap on Resident Work Hours
  • Resident Restructure: Attendings adjust to new work-hour rules
  • What Is the Effect of ACGME Duty Hours Regulations?
  • Otolaryngologists View Resident Work-Hour Restrictions: ACS calls for in-depth investigation before mandating further restrictions

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Physician Handwriting: A Potentially Powerful Healing Tool
    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939