• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Are New Biologics a Game Changer for Treating Nasal Polyposis?

by Susan Bernstein • November 11, 2019

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Rodney J. Schlosser, MDThe pros of these drugs include that they help people avoid the use of long-term steroids. But the cons are that they’re very expensive and require lifelong injections every two to four weeks. —Rodney J. Schlosser, MD

You Might Also Like

  • Biologics for Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyposis
  • Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Superior to Two of Three Biologics in Treating Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps
  • Are Biologics Viable Options for Treating Pediatric Illness?
  • What Otolaryngologists Need to Know about Biologics and Allergic Rhinitis
Explore This Issue
November 2019

Biologics like dupilumab, which suppress the immune system, have potential side effects, Dr. Laidlaw added. Dupilumab’s possible adverse effects include allergic reactions, conjunctivitis, keratitis, injection site reactions, eye and eyelid inflammation, eosinophilia, insomnia, toothache, arthralgia, and gastritis. Patients must not receive live vaccines while taking the drug. However, she has seen only mild reactions from her patients on dupilumab.

“So far, we have not come up against an infection issue with this drug. Local rashes in some patients, and I had a couple of eosinophil counts go up, so we follow these patients. But patients have begged me not to go off their drug. For patients who have failed other treatments, this drug has been incredibly life-altering for them,” she said. “Right now, in part because of knowledge of short- and long-term side effects and costs, if a single surgery gives you five to 10 years of relief, it may be worthwhile to have surgery every five to 10 years. My approach to this is that in patients who have already had one surgery, and either have polyp recurrence after surgery or if the surgery didn’t improve their symptoms enough, then I think dupilumab is a good choice.”

Better for Severe Polyps

Light micrograph of a section through a nasal polyp.

Light micrograph of a section through a nasal polyp.
© STEVE GSCHMEISSNER / Science Source

Biologics may be more appropriate in patients with severe polyps than in those with mild to moderate polyps, said Rodney J. Schlosser, MD, director of the Nose and Sinus Center at the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston. He finds dupilumab’s clinical trial results encouraging, and feels the new drug has good outcomes for quality of life and polyp score reduction.

“Biologics have been studied primarily in patients with severe polyps based on grading scores, but they have not been studied in patients with mild to moderate polyps,” said Dr. Schlosser. “The pros of these drugs include that they help people avoid the use of long-term steroids. But the cons are that they’re very expensive and require lifelong injections every two to four weeks. Injections would be required indefinitely. Biologics should be reserved for patients who have failed comprehensive sinus surgery followed by postoperative steroid rinses. That treatment controls the vast majority of polyp patients. Most don’t need a revision surgery. In the past, surgeons did repeated polypectomy. Now, we know that comprehensive polyp surgery is required to really open the sinuses, and then we deliver the steroid rinse.”

How expensive are biologics? While out-of-pocket costs vary considerably depending on a patient’s individual insurance coverage, dupilumab’s average wholesale price for one box of two prefilled 300 mg/2 mL syringes is $3,517.85, and its wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) is $37,000 per year (P.T. 2018;43:532–535). Endoscopic sinus surgery costs also vary widely depending on location, center, and insurance coverage, but one estimate of the mean cost for surgery is around $10,000 (Value Health. 2018;21(suppl 1):S13).

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Home Slider, Practice Focus, Rhinology Tagged With: biologics, Nasal polyposis, nasal polypsIssue: November 2019

You Might Also Like:

  • Biologics for Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyposis
  • Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Superior to Two of Three Biologics in Treating Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps
  • Are Biologics Viable Options for Treating Pediatric Illness?
  • What Otolaryngologists Need to Know about Biologics and Allergic Rhinitis

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939