• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

As Opioids for Pain Treatment Come Under Greater Scrutiny, Controlled Substance Agreements Matter More

by Steven M. Harris, Esq. • March 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
Steven M. Harris, Esq. The agreements are a valuable way for physicians and patients to communicate what the expectations are for treatment of chronic pain.

Controlled substance agreements, pain contracts, pain management contracts, medication contracts, opioid treatment agreements, informed consent forms, patient contracts for controlled substances. They go by different names, but they all mean the same thing: A signed agreement between the physician and patient that explains the conditions under which the patient will be prescribed opioid pain medications for the relief of chronic pain. Physicians often employ these types of agreements so that the parties are on the same page with regard to the requirements the patient must follow to take the drugs safely.

You Might Also Like

  • Rhinoplasty/Septoplasty Patients Require Few Opioids for Postsurgical Pain
  • Pediatric Pain and Opioids: How to Respond When a Patient Is Still in Pain After a Tonsillectomy
  • Are Opioid Contracts Helpful or Harmful?
  • Interplay Between Physician Employment Agreements, Medical Staff Bylaws Should Not be Ignored
Explore This Issue
March 2013

Controlled substance agreements have become more important than ever with the recent activity in state legislatures, including the passage of intractable pain treatment laws and the issuance of policy from state boards of medical examiners on the use of opioids in pain treatment. In fact, controlled substance agreements are now required to be executed in certain states, such as Florida.

Physicians are increasingly turning to controlled substance agreements as a means of balancing the competing consequences of pain treatment, addiction, respiratory depression, tolerance and diversion on the one hand and fear of regulatory action on the other hand. Physicians, facing investigation or prosecution by the Drug Enforcement Administration, are using controlled substance agreements as evidence that 1) the controlled substances were prescribed, administered, and dispensed for legitimate medical purposes; 2) patients are adequately informed in unity and 3) the physician acted in the usual course of professional practice and otherwise in accordance with laws and regulations governing controlled substances.

Although some patient advocates argue that controlled substance agreements invade patients’ privacy and damage the trust that is essential to the physician–patient relationship, when used effectively, controlled substance agreements are a valuable way for physicians and patients to communicate what the expectations are for the treatment of chronic pain using opioids and how the patients can use the medications safely to avoid overuse and misuse. The agreement can provide a framework to discuss the issues that come up in a treatment plan, especially where substance abuse, including addiction to pain medication, is a serious problem.

What the Agreement Should Address

There is not, however, one preprinted, standardized controlled substance agreement that is binding on all patients, under all circumstances, for all states and legal jurisdictions. In fact, to the contrary, patients should have individualized plans for care that comprehensively address their physical, psychological and social needs. There are, however, some key provisions that should be included in any controlled substance agreement, such as:

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Head and Neck, Legal Matters Tagged With: legal, opioid, pain, patient communicationIssue: March 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • Rhinoplasty/Septoplasty Patients Require Few Opioids for Postsurgical Pain
  • Pediatric Pain and Opioids: How to Respond When a Patient Is Still in Pain After a Tonsillectomy
  • Are Opioid Contracts Helpful or Harmful?
  • Interplay Between Physician Employment Agreements, Medical Staff Bylaws Should Not be Ignored

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939