• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

As Opioids for Pain Treatment Come Under Greater Scrutiny, Controlled Substance Agreements Matter More

by Steven M. Harris, Esq. • March 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Documentation is essential to support the evaluation, the reason for prescribing an opioid, the nature and intensity of the pain, the overall pain management treatment plan, the presence of any recognized medical indications for the use of a controlled substance, any consultations received and a periodic review of the status of the patient. Chart everything. The medical record should include, at a minimum:

You Might Also Like

  • Rhinoplasty/Septoplasty Patients Require Few Opioids for Postsurgical Pain
  • Pediatric Pain and Opioids: How to Respond When a Patient Is Still in Pain After a Tonsillectomy
  • Are Opioid Contracts Helpful or Harmful?
  • Interplay Between Physician Employment Agreements, Medical Staff Bylaws Should Not be Ignored
Explore This Issue
March 2013
  • The complete medical history and a physical examination, including history of drug abuse or dependence;
  • Diagnostic, therapeutic and laboratory results;
  • Evaluations and consultations;
  • Treatment objectives;
  • Discussion of risks and benefits;
  • Treatments;
  • Medications, including date, type, dosage and quantity prescribed;
  • Instructions and agreements;
  • Periodic reviews;
  • Results of any drug testing;
  • A photocopy of the patient’s government-issued photo identification; and
  • If a written prescription for a controlled substance is given to the patient, a duplicate of the prescription.

Physicians who have these safeguards in place will be in a sounder position in the event they find themselves the target of the ongoing crackdown on physicians who are prescribing opiates outside the bounds of accepted medical practice. Also, be sure to check your state’s laws, as these agreements may be legally required. If you are using a controlled substance agreement template, now is the time to review it to ensure that all parties are best protected. If your practice has not yet started using a controlled substance agreement, now is the time to consult with a health care lawyer.


Steven M. Harris, Esq., is a nationally recognized health care attorney and a member of the law firm McDonald Hopkins, LLC. He may be reached at sharris@mcdonaldhopkins.com.

Reprinted with permission from the American College of Rheumatology.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Head and Neck, Legal Matters Tagged With: legal, opioid, pain, patient communicationIssue: March 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • Rhinoplasty/Septoplasty Patients Require Few Opioids for Postsurgical Pain
  • Pediatric Pain and Opioids: How to Respond When a Patient Is Still in Pain After a Tonsillectomy
  • Are Opioid Contracts Helpful or Harmful?
  • Interplay Between Physician Employment Agreements, Medical Staff Bylaws Should Not be Ignored

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939