• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Bringing New Technology to the Provider and the Public

by Sue Pondrom • July 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

From Concept to Testing

William E. Bolger, MD, an otolaryngologist with the Maryland Sinus Center in Bethesda, who was involved in balloon sinuplasty clinical trials, described how an idea is taken from concept into testing.

You Might Also Like

  • Balloon Sinuplasty: A Gentler Approach to Opening Blocked Sinuses
  • Computer Technology Boosts Rhinologic Surgery, but Poses Choices for Surgeons
  • What Are Common Balloon Sinuplasty Complications?
  • Hiring a Public Relations Firm for Your Medical Practice
Explore This Issue
July 2007

“Often, the effective use of the device is already known,” he said. Whereas drugs have a very involved process of multiphase clinical trials, the testing of devices is primarily to determine safety and effectiveness. “The FDA recognizes that with devices, the product developer and the end user—physicians—have to communicate. This is not just for innovation, but also to make devices safer and maximally effective for best medical practices.”

Marvin P. Fried, MD

Marvin P. Fried, MD

Dr. Bolger noted that since 1980 and the Bayh-Dole Act (in which innovation was stimulated as universities were allowed to commercialize their inventions without the loss of federal funding), corporate contributions to university research budgets increased from a little over $20 million to $2.3 billion in 2000. “Today, 60 percent of all clinical trials in the United States are funded by the biotech and pharmaceutical industries. We have to recognize that many patients have benefited from industry’s involvement,” he said.

However, when industry finances a study, there are financial biases that must be addressed through disclosure, he said, adding that physicians should also be aware of additional sources of bias including politics, personal beliefs, rivalries, and academic passions.

Dr. Bolger ended his remarks by noting that he has often been approached by salespeople from companies. “I would like to see a process where otolaryngology colleagues can show me real testing data. Subject it to publication and peer review,” he said. “And we would like to have the people with the most experience with the technology participate in its evaluation.”

Corporate Point of View

Representing the corporate viewpoint was panelist William M. Facteau, President and CEO of Acclarent, Inc., the Menlo Park, CA, company that makes the device used in balloon sinuplasty™.

“When a salesperson approaches you,” he told the audience, “be assured that the company has gone through a tremendous amount of work and effort in navigating through the entire development process.”

Mr. Facteau noted that safety is the most important thing a medical device company needs to take into consideration before launching a new technology. “That is our biggest challenge and our direction. When is the right time to move from a bench model or to a cadaver, or to animals and then, finally, into humans?”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Practice Management, Tech Talk Issue: July 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Balloon Sinuplasty: A Gentler Approach to Opening Blocked Sinuses
  • Computer Technology Boosts Rhinologic Surgery, but Poses Choices for Surgeons
  • What Are Common Balloon Sinuplasty Complications?
  • Hiring a Public Relations Firm for Your Medical Practice

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939