• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Case Studies: Malpractice or Bad Outcome?

by John Austin • October 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Ms. Foltz: It is absolutely true that a bad outcome is not enough to prove malpractice. But remember, there will always be someone out there, I guarantee you, who will testify against you and there is nothing you can do to guard against them. My suggestion is if you have an outcome that is not what you expected or desired, the best thing you can do to try and avoid a lawsuit down the road is to talk to the patient honestly and empathetically about what happened.

You Might Also Like

  • So You Think a Malpractice Suit Is Bad?
  • Reimbursement and Outcome Measurement in Otolaryngology Practices: What the Government Can Do to You and for You
  • Medical Malpractice and Rhinology
  • Case Studies in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
Explore This Issue
October 2006

Dr. Kennedy: A recent case that I know of was a very similar injury, where the patient had somewhat more brain damage and they ended up having to turn off the respirator. That case settled for $7.5 million, so it shows that this is not necessarily the way it will go.

Dr. Stankiewicz: In big metropolitan areas you, as the treating doctor, can be in big trouble in a case like this. This particular case was in a very affluent physician-friendly area. In a major metro area, and an outcome like that, you’re going to have some real defense problems.

Dr. Lanza: I would submit that, defensible or not, bilateral removal with the skull base and/or multiple brain tissue removal during elective sinus surgery is well outside the standard of care.

CASE #3

Your patient is undergoing an endoscopic orbital decompression for Graves’ disease. Your assistant is a well-trained senior resident and he is operating while you are observing on the video screen. The resident is removing the bone posterior near the optic canal and he slips and clearly impacts the optic nerve. The videotape is running.

When do you talk to the family?

Dr. Kennedy: I would probably tell the family, while the patient was still asleep, that we are concerned that there was some trauma to the optic nerve. We will have to see how his vision is after he wakes up, but that we do have some concern.

Dr. Lanza: I would devote all my attention to the patient and not think anything about discussing it with the family. I would spend my time taking care of the specific event-awaken the patient, evaluate the vision, and then discuss it fully with the family.

Dr. Mattox: Our approach in situations like this is to get the family informed and on board early on, though obviously not at the expense of taking care of the patient.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Head and Neck, Legal Matters, Practice Focus, Practice Management, Rhinology Tagged With: cases, COSM, functional endoscopic sinus surgery, guidelines, lawsuits, legal, malpractice, Medicare, outcomes, patient communication, residentsIssue: October 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • So You Think a Malpractice Suit Is Bad?
  • Reimbursement and Outcome Measurement in Otolaryngology Practices: What the Government Can Do to You and for You
  • Medical Malpractice and Rhinology
  • Case Studies in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939