• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Choice of Ear for Cochlear Implantation: Implant the Better- or Worse-Hearing Ear?

by Aniruddha Patki, MD, and Debara L. Tucci MD, MS, MBA • June 5, 2016

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Trio Best Practice
TRIO Best Practice articles are brief, structured reviews designed to provide the busy clinician with a handy outline and reference for day-to-day clinical decision making. The ENTtoday summaries below include the Background and Best Practice sections of the original article. To view the complete Laryngoscope articles free of charge, visit Laryngoscope.com.

You Might Also Like

  • Choosing the Better- Or Worse-Hearing Ear for Cochlear Implantation
  • Hybrid Cochlear Implant Helps Preserve Residual Low-Frequency Hearing
  • New Cochlear Implant Improves Hearing in Subset of Patients
  • Bilateral CI in Children Shows Few Benefits Over Unilateral Implantation
Explore This Issue
June 2016

Background

The availability of cochlear implants (CIs) has led to significant advances in hearing rehabilitation. Indications for implantation have expanded significantly since the technology was introduced, and many more patients today are considered eligible for the device. As indications have become less restrictive, patients with poor but serviceable hearing in at least one ear have been implanted. In such patients, implantation of the poorer ear allows the possibility of bimodal stimulation, utilizing a contralateral hearing aid (HA). However, implantation of the poorer ear has raised concerns that the implant could be less beneficial in an auditory system that has been long deprived of stimulation. Analysis of this question may be aided by addressing two related questions: 1) Is there a clear benefit to bimodal stimulation (utilizing one HA and one CI) over stimulation with one CI alone? 2) Does the degree of hearing loss preimplant affect the derived benefit from the implant? If the answer to the first is yes and the answer to the second is no, then the ideal ear to implant should be the poorer ear.

Best Practice

These studies demonstrate significant benefit of bimodal stimulation over a single CI. Furthermore, the benefit of a CI to speech perception appears to be more positively correlated with the integrity of central nervous system pathways for auditory processing than the preimplant functional status of the inner ear and eighth cranial nerve. This suggests that in patients with asymmetric hearing loss, in cases where a single ear is to be implanted, the optimal choice of ear for cochlear implantation is the poorer ear (Laryngoscope. 2015;125:5-6).

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus Tagged With: cochlear implantsIssue: June 2016

You Might Also Like:

  • Choosing the Better- Or Worse-Hearing Ear for Cochlear Implantation
  • Hybrid Cochlear Implant Helps Preserve Residual Low-Frequency Hearing
  • New Cochlear Implant Improves Hearing in Subset of Patients
  • Bilateral CI in Children Shows Few Benefits Over Unilateral Implantation

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939