• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Current Controversies in Rhinologic Surgery

by Pippa Wysong • July 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The modified Lothrop (Draf III) is a frontal sinus drill-out that has been successful at opening these areas widely, he said. It was developed in the mid-1990s and entails removal of the interfrontal septum, the superior part of the nasal septum, and the frontal sinus floor from orbit to orbit laterally.

You Might Also Like

  • Frontal Sinus Drillout Viable for Frontal Sinus Disease
  • Computer Technology Boosts Rhinologic Surgery, but Poses Choices for Surgeons
  • The State of the Art of Image-Guided Surgery
  • How To: Reconstruction of Anterior Table Frontal Sinus Defects with Pericranial Flap and Titanium Mesh
Explore This Issue
July 2008

There are three general parts of the operation. The first is creating the superior septal perforation and removing the anterior 1 cm of the middle turbinates. In the second, one or both frontal recesses are identified, and a bur is used to remove the frontal floor from posterior to anterior. In the third, the surgeon moves across the midline, removing bone to create the largest possible oval opening to both frontal sinuses.

As an endoscopic procedure, the modified Lothrop is less invasive and has less blood loss compared with an external approach. It leaves no external scar, and postoperative surveillance can be done with CT and endoscopy. The disadvantages are that it is a technically difficult procedure in an area with dangerous anatomy, such as nearby brain and eye tissue. Postoperative care can be extensive, and it is less likely to be successful in patients with hypertrophic bone or active disease.

Indications for the procedure can include inverted papilloma and mucoceles. I love to do mucoceles this way, because they open up so nicely and then tend to heal quite well, Dr. Leopold said.

However, there can be unpleasant results, such as recurrence of fungal disease and polyps. Furthermore, close to 20% of patients may need a repeat Lothrop. He reported that in his experience about 15% of patients note a decrease in their sense of smell afterward.

Overall, the modified Lothrop has radically changed the management of FSS, and gives the largest frontal opening. It is also one of the most difficult frontal sinus operations we perform, he said.

Osteoplastic Flap

On the other hand, the modified Lothrop can help prevent the need for an osteoplastic flap, according to James Stankiewicz, MD, Chairman of Otolaryngology at Loyola University Medical Center in Chicago. He spoke about the pros and cons of osteoplastic frontal flap for treating frontal sinus disease.

The indications for the procedure include acute complications in the frontal sinus, chronic (and complicated) sinusitis, and frontal sinus tumors or fractures.

The standard incision is the coronal incision. Dr. Stankiewicz noted that he prefers a forehead incision. He suggests making the incision in a crease of a wrinkle in the forehead.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Medical Education, Practice Focus, Rhinology Tagged With: debate, frontal endoscopic sinus surgery, outcomes, surgery, techniques, treatmentIssue: July 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • Frontal Sinus Drillout Viable for Frontal Sinus Disease
  • Computer Technology Boosts Rhinologic Surgery, but Poses Choices for Surgeons
  • The State of the Art of Image-Guided Surgery
  • How To: Reconstruction of Anterior Table Frontal Sinus Defects with Pericranial Flap and Titanium Mesh

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939