• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Dehiscence Size in SSCD Correlates with Air-Bone Gap Size

by Gerard Gianoli, MD • March 1, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Does the size of the dehiscence in SSCD correlate with the size of the air-bone gap?

Background: Patients with superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) present with a variety of symptoms that may include a low frequency conductive hearing loss on pure-tone audiometry. It has been postulated that this air-bone gap happens when the dehiscent superior canal acts as a third mobile window, dissipating acoustic energy. Not all patients exhibit an air-bone gap, however, and, to date, no study has correlated the size of the air-bone gap with the size of the dehiscence.

You Might Also Like

  • Low-Frequency Air-Bone Gaps Indicator for Endolymphatic Hydrops
  • Superior Canal Dehiscence Linked to Abnormal ECoG Readings
  • Certain Approaches to Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Repair Are Effective for Favorable Hearing Outcomes for Patients
  • Patient with Conductive Hearing Loss
Explore This Issue
March 2010

Study Design: Retrospective chart review of 23 patients (28 ears) diagnosed with SSCD

Setting: Tertiary referral center in Perth, Australia

Synopsis: Twenty-three patients (28 ears) met the study criteria of typical SSCD history; at least one physiologic test confirming SSCD (usually an abnormal vestibular evoked myogenic potential [VEMP]); and observation of SSCD on a high-resolution CT scan of the temporal bone. The dehiscent areas of the superior semicircular canal were measured to the nearest 0.5 mm and ranged from 1.0 – 6.0 mm (mean 3.5 ± 1.6mm). The air-bone gap was determined for 500, 1,000 and 2,000 Hz, both individually and as an average of the three frequencies. All six ears that did not have an air-bone gap had dehiscences measuring less than 3.0 mm. In the 22 ears that demonstrated air-bone gaps, the gaps ranged from 3.3 to 27 dB (mean 11.6 ± 5.7 dB). A linear regression analysis demonstrated a coefficient of 0.780 (p<0.001), suggesting that the larger the dehiscence, the bigger the air-bone gap.

Bottom Line: A low frequency air-bone gap was consistently documented in patients with SSCD where the dehiscence measures greater than 3 mm. The size of the air-bone gap increased with the size of the dehiscence.

Citation: Yuen HW, Boeddinghaus R, Eikelboom RH, et al. The relationship between the air-bone gap and the size of the superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;141(6):689-694.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus Tagged With: air-bone gapIssue: March 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • Low-Frequency Air-Bone Gaps Indicator for Endolymphatic Hydrops
  • Superior Canal Dehiscence Linked to Abnormal ECoG Readings
  • Certain Approaches to Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Repair Are Effective for Favorable Hearing Outcomes for Patients
  • Patient with Conductive Hearing Loss

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939