• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Disagreement exists regarding the cost-effectiveness and necessity of an initial GdT1W MRI

by Marisa Ryan, MD, Jane L. Weissman, MD, and David Kaylie, MD • August 9, 2016

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Trio Best PracticeTRIO Best Practice articles are brief, structured reviews designed to provide the busy clinician with a handy outline and reference for day-to-day clinical decision making. The ENTtoday summaries below include the Background and Best Practice sections of the original article. To view the complete Laryngoscope articles free of charge, visit Laryngoscope.com.

You Might Also Like

  • Is Gadolinium Contrast Enhancement Necessary in Screening MRI for ASNHL?
  • MRI Is Cost-Effective for Diagnosing Asymmetric SNHL
  • High-Resolution CT and Diffusion-Weighted MRI Combo Improves Pediatric Cholesteatoma Detection
  • MRI, CT Beneficial for Pediatric Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Explore This Issue
August 2016

Background

Caption: A) Axial T1-weighted MRI with gadolinium contrast enhancement showing left-sided vestibular schwannoma (VS). B) Axial T2-weighted MRI of the posterior fossa showing round lesion inside the VS (arrow) with surrounding hemosiderin deposits. C) Axial CT image through the posterior fossa showing a hyperdens area due to intratumoral hemorrhage in the VS. D) Axial T1-weighted postcontrast MRI showing hemorrhage (hypo-intense area) inside lesion (arrow). The VS enhances homogeneous and contrast-sparing occurs at the location of the hematoma (R right, L left).

(click for larger image)
Caption: A) Axial T1-weighted MRI with gadolinium contrast enhancement showing left-sided vestibular schwannoma (VS). B) Axial T2-weighted MRI of the posterior fossa showing round lesion inside the VS (arrow) with surrounding hemosiderin deposits. C) Axial CT image through the posterior fossa showing a hyperdens area due to intratumoral hemorrhage in the VS. D) Axial T1-weighted postcontrast MRI showing hemorrhage (hypo-intense area) inside lesion (arrow). The VS enhances homogeneous and contrast-sparing occurs at the location of the hematoma (R right, L left).

Gadolinium contrast enhanced T1 weighted magnetic resonance imaging (GdT1W MRI) is the most widely accepted evaluation for asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss (ASNHL). It has replaced auditory brainstem response (ABR) and computed tomography to detect anatomical abnormalities such as acoustic neuromas (ANs) as the initial screening test after obtaining the history, physical, and audiogram. The cost of a complete brain GdT1W MRI is not insignificant. Gadolinium has a risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and must be used cautiously with renal dysfunction. Alternatively, noncontrasted fast spin-echo T2-weighted (FSE T2W) MRIs focused on the internal auditory canal (IAC) and cerebellopontine angle (CPA) can be performed in only 10 minutes. The sensitivity of these protocols for screening, particularly for smaller lesions, has been questioned. Disagreement exists regarding the cost-effectiveness and necessity of an initial GdT1W MRI, which is relevant in an era needing cost-containment.

Best Practice

Nonenhanced FSE T2W MRI targeted to the IAC/CPA can be used as an initial imaging modality to rule out anatomical abnormality in ASNHL because of the excellent detail it provides. It is rapid, cost-effective, and sensitive. To be appropriate and accurate, it requires patient evaluation by an experienced otolaryngologist, slices ≤ 2 mm, and review by a neuroradiologist. It should be applied judiciously to patients without other neurologic or vestibular symptoms. Otolaryngologists need to remain aware and counsel their patients that small ANs, labyrinthine ANs, and inflammatory disorders can be missed. It is crucial to have open communication between the otolaryngologist and neuroradiologist to ensure proper protocoling. The otolaryngologist should begin this by communicating that the MRI is ordered to evaluate for ASNHL; this is different than the widely accepted protocol with contrast. This will enable the neuroradiologist to evaluate the MRI appropriately and recommend further imaging with contrast to clarify positive findings or inadequate studies. Since the T2W screen can either reliably identify a mass or prompt the use of contrast, it is a safe and effective screening tool. The benefit could be realized in substantial time and cost savings for the patient and medical system (Laryngoscope. 2015;125:783-784).

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Otology/Neurotology, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus, TRIO Best Practices Tagged With: asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss, cost, gadolinium constrast enhancement, GdT1W MRI, MRI, patient careIssue: August 2016

You Might Also Like:

  • Is Gadolinium Contrast Enhancement Necessary in Screening MRI for ASNHL?
  • MRI Is Cost-Effective for Diagnosing Asymmetric SNHL
  • High-Resolution CT and Diffusion-Weighted MRI Combo Improves Pediatric Cholesteatoma Detection
  • MRI, CT Beneficial for Pediatric Sensorineural Hearing Loss

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939