• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Drug Trials for Hearing Loss, Tinnitus Therapies Show Promise

by David Bronstein • June 8, 2015

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Dr. Meyer said he has been involved in researching tinnitus-targeted drug therapy since 2003, when he first launched Auris Medical. During that time, he noted, he has learned that selectivity is one of the keys to successful drug development. In the case of tinnitus, “you not only have to target the right type or etiology, where you fully understand the biology; you also have to be very specific regarding the type of patient you’re treating. For us, our clinical data suggest that patients in the early stages of the disorder—up to three months out, possibly more—will respond best to our approach.”

You Might Also Like

  • Optimal Usage of Intratympanic Drug Therapy for Sudden Hearing Loss Unclear
  • Tinnitus Research Implicates Brain Structures in Hearing Disorder
  • New Drug May Help Prevent, Treat Tinnitus
  • Hearing Loss Less Prevalent among African-Americans
Explore This Issue
June 2015

Dr. Meyer said he is optimistic that a phase 3 trial of acute tinnitus launched in the United States in February 2014, known as TACTT2, will replicate the positive findings of previous trials.

Another Mechanism, Another Hearing Disorder

Auris Medical also has several clinical trials in the works in the United States and Europe that focus on sudden and surgery-induced hearing loss. The drug being evaluated, AM-111, is a stress kinase inhibitor peptide known as D-JNKI-1 that is formulated in a biocompatible and biodegradable gel. By acting on that kinase, AM-111 prevents apoptosis in hair cells and also attenuates the damaging effects of cellular inflammation following acute inner ear injury (Hear Res. 2007;226:168-177).

In a phase 2 clinical trial of AM-111, patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss (PTA thresholds > 60dB) who were treated with 0.4 mg/mL of the drug showed an absolute improvement in hearing loss to day seven of the study (29.9 dB vs. 17.9 dB for place-treated patients; P=0.017) (Otol Neurotol. 2014;35:1317-1326). The drug was well tolerated, with no negative impact on hearing, balance, or tinnitus.

Dr. Meyer said he is excited by the prospect of seeing the first drugs specifically developed for inner ear therapy moving towards broad clinical use. “If all goes well, there will be FDA drugs approved for intratympanic treatments in a few years from now,” he said. “That could have quite an impact on the field of otology.”

Hinrich Staecker, MD, PhD, a professor of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery at the University of Kansas Medical Center in Kansas City, has participated in all three clinical trials involving AM-101. Although “we’re not long enough out” on the phase 3 study, “based on what we’ve seen with prior patients, the prospects for this drug therapy are very promising,” he said.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Home Slider, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus, Special Report Tagged With: drugs, hearing loss, medication, tinnitusIssue: June 2015

You Might Also Like:

  • Optimal Usage of Intratympanic Drug Therapy for Sudden Hearing Loss Unclear
  • Tinnitus Research Implicates Brain Structures in Hearing Disorder
  • New Drug May Help Prevent, Treat Tinnitus
  • Hearing Loss Less Prevalent among African-Americans

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Gap Year for Research: Is It Worth It?
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • What Happens to Medical Students Who Don’t Match?
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939