• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

How Crowdsourcing Is Maximizing the Impact of Medical Research

by Renée Bacher • January 7, 2019

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
© Arthimedes / shutterstock.com

© Arthimedes / shutterstock.com

While crowdsourcing for the general population might mean getting on Facebook and asking friends to recommend a plumber, reading reviews on Yelp, or contributing information to a Wikipedia page, medical researchers are now using crowdsourcing to save research time, expedite diagnoses, and pursue groundbreaking discoveries powered by new technologies.

You Might Also Like

  • Tips on Contributing to and Keeping up with Medical Research
  • Consensus Reached on Checklist for Operative Notes Following Pediatric Microlaryngoscopy and Bronchoscopy
  • Five Ways to Improve Surgeon Participation in Medical Research
  • How COVID-19 Has Impacted Medical Research
Explore This Issue
January 2019

In 2014, The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research provided smart watches to study participants with Parkinson’s disease to track their movements and the management of their illness. In 2015, The American Heart Association (AHA) and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) released a new best-practices guide that endorsed crowdsourcing as a way to “… accelerate medical research and improve global cardiovascular health,” according to an AHA news release. The guide, Crowdsourcing Medical Research Priorities: A Guide for Funding Agencies, is the work of PRANCCER (Precision Medicine Advances using Nationally Crowdsourced Comparative Effectiveness Research) and a joint initiative of the AHA and PCORI.

And, last year, Apple released ResearchKit, an open-source software that runs on the iPhone and can make use of the phone’s sensors to collect data such as daily step counts and heart rates for research purposes. The software can also be used for facial recognition for autism diagnosis and to track seizures, among other things. Medical researchers can use ResearchKit to develop a variety of apps that create tools such as consent forms, real-time tasks, and surveys with modules that can be customized and shared. The software also works with wearables like the Apple Watch, which, like other smart watches, can monitor users throughout the day. For airway disorders, for example, otolaryngologists might employ wearable technology to track study participants’ exercise tolerance or how much they sleep.

Beyond collecting patient data, physicians and researchers are using the power of the crowd to gather expert opinions and delegate microtasks to large groups of people, among other things. Karthik Balakrishnan, MD, MPH, an otolaryngologist and pediatric airway disorders specialist at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., has used crowdsourcing to consult with peers, patients, and patient’s parents, delivering surveys on their experiences at the clinic or the hospital and using that data to reach a consensus and improve the quality of both visits and treatment.

Dr. Balakrishnan first became interested in crowdsourcing when he heard innovator and patient empowerment expert Lucien Engelen speak at a conference about crowdsourcing the locations of automated external defibrillators (AED) throughout the Netherlands to help save lives during cardiac emergencies. Currently, Dr. Balakrishnan is working on a grant-funded project for which he recruits a carefully selected population of patients’ parents to join a private Facebook group. “We’ve selected the type of patient where the parents tend to be educated about the condition and very invested in the child’s care,” he said. He added that the purpose of this project is two-fold: The first goal is proof of concept, to show he can get useful results from crowdsourcing in this way; the second is the increased contact with parents whose children’s disease is his specialty.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features Tagged With: crowdsourcing, medical research, social mediaIssue: January 2019

You Might Also Like:

  • Tips on Contributing to and Keeping up with Medical Research
  • Consensus Reached on Checklist for Operative Notes Following Pediatric Microlaryngoscopy and Bronchoscopy
  • Five Ways to Improve Surgeon Participation in Medical Research
  • How COVID-19 Has Impacted Medical Research

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939