• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

How To: Nasopharyngectomy without Maxillary Swing via a Combined Open Lateral and Endoscopic Approach

by Zachary Elliott, BS, Sean Parsel, DO, Brian Swendseid, MD, Kevin B. Xiao, MD, S. Hamad Sagheer, MD, Joseph M. Curry, MD, Mindy Rabinowitz, MD, Gurston Nyquist, MD, Marc R. Rosen, MD, James Evans, MD, Christopher J. Farrell, MD, and Adam J. Luginbuhl, MD • January 18, 2023

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

INTRODUCTION

Nasopharyngectomy can be used as a salvage surgery to remove residual or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinomas (rNPC) after radiotherapy and is associated with improved local control and increased overall survival compared to reirradiation alone (World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;1:34–43; Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2011;44:1141–1154). The proximity of the nasopharynx to the skull base and critical anatomic structures, however, particularly the internal carotid artery (ICA), makes surgical resection of the nasopharynx challenging. To access these tumors, transfacial and transcervical corridors have been described, most notably through a maxillary or mandibular swing or endoscopic endonasal approach (Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017;7:425–432).

You Might Also Like

  • How To: Endoscopic Medial Orbitotomy for Lateral Access to Anterior Cranial Base Pathology
  • How To: Transseptal Approach to the Maxillary Sinus and Pterygopalatine Fossa
  • Endoscopic versus Open Craniofacial Resection of Esthesioneuroblastoma: What Is the Evidence?
  • Endoscopic Endonasal Transethmoidal Supraorbital Approach for Orbitectomy Is a Viable Alternative
Explore This Issue
January 2023

The maxillary swing is a well-described approach that involves facial translocation through Le Fort I osteotomies and allows access to the nasopharynx and parapharyngeal space through the posterior wall of the maxillary sinus for en bloc resection. Although this approach results in better survival rates, there are risks of infraorbital nerve injury, facial numbness, trismus, palatal fistula, osteonecrosis, and difficulty accessing and protecting the ICA (World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;1:34–43).

Although a transcervical or transfacial approach affords maximal access to the nasopharynx, it has high postoperative morbidity. Endoscopic nasopharyngectomy provides minimally invasive access and is considered by many to be the preferred surgical treatment for rNPCs when feasible based on tumor anatomy and surgeon skill. Optical telescopes offer improved visualization of the nasopharynx compared to open approaches and allow for closer visualization of tumor margins. Using expanded endoscopic techniques, many tumors can be accessed using an endonasal approach with significantly reduced morbidity. Despite this access, identification of the parapharyngeal ICA remains challenging, as direct visualization is hindered by soft tissue and tumor. To mitigate these issues, we describe a method of combining a lateral transcervical approach, to provide proximal ICA control and early visualization without the morbidity of a maxillary swing, with the endonasal endoscopic approach, allowing two teams to work concurrently and more expeditiously with improved ICA management and sound oncologic control of the tumor laterally at the Eustachian tube and parapharyngeal space.

METHOD

A retrospective case series of patients with nasopharyngeal malignancies who underwent combined open lateral approach and endoscopic transnasal nasopharyngectomy was performed. Patients were included if they underwent a combined approach for resection of nasopharyngeal tumor and excluded if they underwent endoscopic resection without a simultaneous lateral approach. Data were collected on three males with rNPC and two females with adenoid cystic carcinoma. A cadaveric dissection was also performed to demonstrate the approach and identify relevant anatomy.

Surgical Technique

A combined transcervical and endoscopic endonasal approach to access the infratemporal fossa and parapharyngeal space was performed in all patients. A modified preauricular/transcervical incision was designed. The facial nerve was kept within the parotid parenchyma and elevated along with the parotid tail, rather than identifying the nerve and potentially creating a stretch injury from retraction on an unprotected nerve. The stylomandibular ligament was transected and the styloid process removed to the skull base, taking care to gently elevate the parotid in this area to protect the facial nerve within the parenchyma. Anterior retraction or ligation of the external carotid artery was performed to open the post-styloid parapharyngeal space. The ICA was identified, along with the glossopharyngeal, vagus, accessory, and hypoglossal nerves.

Next, the nasopharynx musculature, including the superior constrictor and Eustachian tube complex, were identified anteromedial to the great vessels. We dissected the previously identified ICA and nerves to the level of the skull base, while identifying signs of tumor involvement. At the level of the carotid canal, a 3-in. Cottonoid was placed medial to the carotid artery to provide a visual cue and protection during subsequent endonasal tumor dissection (Figure 1). With the ICA identified, protected, and lateralized relative to the tumor, endonasal endoscopic tumor dissection was conducted via a transpterygoid approach to access the pterygomaxillary and infratemporal fossae. We accomplished this by performing a medial maxillectomy followed by identification and ligation of the sphenopalatine artery.

Figure 1. (A) Styloid ligament has been transected and a Cottonoid pledget placed on the internal carotid artery for protection during tumor resection. The tumor lies in the nasopharynx, obstructing the Eustachian tube. (B) Endoscope and instrument accessing nasopharynx via the nares with additional instruments entering nasopharynx via the lateral, transcervical access.

 

Then, the pterygoid plates were identified and resected for access to the anteromedial boundaries of the tumor. The pterygomaxillary fissure was then resected. The posterior extent of dissection was dictated by tumor involvement. After endonasal mucosal cuts were completed, the superior constrictor attachments to the skull base were released from both the endonasal and lateral approach, revealing the foramen lacerum and foramen ovale. The endonasal tumor dissection ultimately communicated with the cervical incision around the specimen, and either the endonasal or the cervical access could be used to complete tumor extirpation. With the carotid canal and foramen lacerum in full view, we were able to transect the Eustachian tube using the lateral approach as it entered its bony canal. In all cases, either reconstruction with regional pedicled flap or free tissue transfer was used to close the nasopharyngeal defect (see the supporting video).

RESULTS

Five patients underwent the combined approach surgery between March 2019 and October 2021. Patients 1–3 and 5 received definitive chemoradiotherapy to the skull base. Pathological examination of the surgical specimens confirmed that tissue margins were free of disease, except for patient 5. The mean operative time was 13 hours.

Patients 1, 3, and 4 had uncomplicated postoperative courses. Patient 2 had vocal cord paresis secondary to surgical manipulation at the time of resection that subsequently resolved without any intervention. Patient 5 required return to the OR for hematoma evacuation one day after surgery. There were no cerebrospinal fluid leaks, flap failures, or meningitis. The mean follow-up time was 15.1 months, with no evidence of tumor recurrence in all patients.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Multi-Page

Filed Under: Head and Neck, How I Do It, Practice Focus Tagged With: surgical managementIssue: January 2023

You Might Also Like:

  • How To: Endoscopic Medial Orbitotomy for Lateral Access to Anterior Cranial Base Pathology
  • How To: Transseptal Approach to the Maxillary Sinus and Pterygopalatine Fossa
  • Endoscopic versus Open Craniofacial Resection of Esthesioneuroblastoma: What Is the Evidence?
  • Endoscopic Endonasal Transethmoidal Supraorbital Approach for Orbitectomy Is a Viable Alternative

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939