• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

In-Flight Medical Emergencies Are Common, Best Handled by a Team

by Amy E. Hamaker • October 13, 2019

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

You Might Also Like

  • What Are Physicians’ Ethical Responsibilities to Respond to Medical Emergencies?
  • An Otolaryngologist as Flight Surgeon: One Doctor’s Experience in Operation Iraqi Freedom
  • Potential for In-Office ENT Emergencies on the Rise
  • The Medical Home Gains Momentum: Could a team-based model work for otolaryngology?
Explore This Issue
October 2019

Comments: This review article describes the incidence and typical causes of medical emergencies in-flight. It covers laws surrounding medical volunteers and presents an algorithm describing a general approach to inflight medical emergencies. There are helpful specific recommendations for the most common types of emergencies encountered during flight. —Cristina Cabrera-Muffly, MD
I pray for no in-flight emergencies in general, but definitely not complex medical ones. As we gain and practice our specialized skill set, others fall by the wayside. It was nice to see a framework for emergencies presented in a quick and easy to follow manner (I’m saving figures 1 and 2 to my phone!). The article also presents a quick primer on how to handle in-flight emergencies (or even scary situations at a neighborhood BBQ, etc., while waiting for EMS to arrive). —Jennifer A. Villwock, MD

How common are in-flight medical emergencies (IMEs), and what are the best responses to them by traveling medical personnel?

Bottom Line: In-flight medical emergencies most commonly involve near-syncope and gastrointestinal, respiratory, and cardiovascular symptoms. Healthcare professionals can assist during these emergencies as part of a collaborative team involving the flight crew and ground-based physicians.

Background: Cruising at 35,000 feet with limited medical equipment, often hours away from the closest medical facility, creates an unfamiliar care challenge for many healthcare professionals. The key to success is for everyone involved to contribute their expertise as part of a collaborative team, with the sole goal of ensuring the best interest of the patient and all passengers on board.

Study design: A literature search conducted in MEDLINE using PubMed for 317 English-only articles published between January 1, 1990, and June 2, 2018.

Setting: MEDLINE database.

Synopsis: The aggregate frequency of medical conditions among 49,100 IMEs showed that syncope or near-syncope was the most common; other common condition categories included gastrointestinal, respiratory, and cardiovascular symptoms. In-flight cardiac arrest was rare. Altitude changes commonly trigger discomfort, especially among those with existing upper respiratory tract inflammation or infection, including sinusitis or otitis media. Passengers with hypoxia or respiratory insufficiency at baseline may benefit from supplemental oxygen at cruising altitude. Cabin air, drawn from an outside dry environment at altitude and pressurized and dehumidified, may contribute to dehydration among passengers. Recycled air may also expose passengers to potential allergens.

On a flight crew’s request for assistance, medical professionals should identify themselves and report their training and current clinical practice. Next, the assessment should determine the type and duration of symptoms, presence of high-risk symptoms (e.g., chest pain, shortness of breath, focal weakness), vital signs, mental status, and pertinent physical findings. Communication clarity is often a challenge, including device issues and relaying of information. If multiple potential volunteers exist, a collegial conversation about capabilities is optimal.

Citation: Martin-Gill C, Doyle TJ, Yealy DM, et al. In-flight medical emergencies: a review. JAMA. 2018;320:2580–2590.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Literature Reviews Tagged With: medical emergencies, patient careIssue: October 2019

You Might Also Like:

  • What Are Physicians’ Ethical Responsibilities to Respond to Medical Emergencies?
  • An Otolaryngologist as Flight Surgeon: One Doctor’s Experience in Operation Iraqi Freedom
  • Potential for In-Office ENT Emergencies on the Rise
  • The Medical Home Gains Momentum: Could a team-based model work for otolaryngology?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939