• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

INCS Use for Rhinitis Not Associated with Cataracts, Intraocular Pressure

by Amy E. Hamaker • January 7, 2019

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Does the use of intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) lead to increased intraocular pressure (IOP) above 20 mm Hg, glaucoma, or formation of posterior subcapsular cataracts in adult patients with rhinitis?

Bottom Line:
INCS use is not associated with a significant risk of elevating IOP or developing a posterior subcapsular cataract in patients with allergic rhinitis. Presence of glaucoma, however, is the real clinical adverse event of concern.

You Might Also Like

  • Local Nasal Immunotherapy Safe, Effective for Allergic Rhinitis
  • SCIT Effective for Asthma, Allergic Rhinitis
  • 30-Unit Dose of Abobotulinum Toxin A Reduces Most Nasal Allergic Rhinitis Symptoms
  • Kinetic Oscillation Stimulation an Effective, Lasting Second-Line Treatment for Patients with Nonallergic Rhinitis
Explore This Issue
January 2019

Background: Although the safety and efficacy of INCS are well established, there remains a concern that its use can lead to systemic side effects as seen with oral steroid administration, including the risk of posterior subcapsular cataracts or open-angle glaucoma. There have been no meta-analyses conducted on ocular changes, and only a handful of review articles discuss the use of INCS and ocular changes.

Study design: Literature review of 10 randomized controlled trials.

Setting: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases.

Synopsis: Four of the studies were useable for meta-analysis. Overall, risk of bias ranged from low to unclear for the majority of the domains across the included studies, and the patient population included patients older than 18 years of age, except for two studies, which included adolescents. All patients had a diagnosis of rhinitis. There were no patients with preexisting glaucoma or with evidence of posterior subcapsular cataract formation prior to INCS use except for two patients in one study who had posterior subcapsular cataracts at baseline that were initially missed. There were only two studies that assessed ocular changes with first generation INCS (beclomethasone); the majority mentioned use of tonometry to assess IOPs, but the exact tools varied. The absolute increased incidence of elevated IOP in patients using INCS was 0.8%. The overall incidence of glaucoma was 0/2,837. The absolute increased incidence of patients developing a posterior subcapsular cataract while using INCS versus placebo was not significant. In the meta-analysis, there were no patients with preexisting glaucoma. In total, the overall sample size was 2,226 patients, with 1,587 receiving the study drug and 639 receiving a placebo. All studies shared a follow-up period at 52 weeks. The overall pooled relative risk of abnormally elevated IOP in those who received INCS was 2.24 compared to those who received placebo. This study is limited in its generalizability.

Citation: Valenzuela, CV, Liu JC, Vila PM, Simon L, Doering M, Lieu JEC. Intranasal corticosteroids do not lead to ocular changes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. Published September 19, 2018 online ahead of print. doi: 10.1002/lary.27209

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Practice Focus, Rhinology, Rhinology Tagged With: Intraocular Pressure, rhinitisIssue: January 2019

You Might Also Like:

  • Local Nasal Immunotherapy Safe, Effective for Allergic Rhinitis
  • SCIT Effective for Asthma, Allergic Rhinitis
  • 30-Unit Dose of Abobotulinum Toxin A Reduces Most Nasal Allergic Rhinitis Symptoms
  • Kinetic Oscillation Stimulation an Effective, Lasting Second-Line Treatment for Patients with Nonallergic Rhinitis

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939