• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Indications for Surgical Intervention

by Seth M. Pransky, MD • November 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Seth M. Pransky, MD, is Director of Pediatric Otolaryngology at Rady Children’s Hospital in San Diego. He earned his medical degree from Washington University in St. Louis. His postgraduate training included a residency in otolaryngology from the University of Pennsylvania and a fellowship in pediatric otolaryngology at Children’s Hospital Medical Center in Washington, DC. Dr. Pransky is on the speaker’s bureau for ArthroCare and receives grant funds for research.

You Might Also Like

  • Surgical Indications for Pediatric Turbinate Reduction: Arguments For and Against
  • A More Conservative Approach
  • Which Inferior Turbinate Reduction Technique Best Decreases Nasal Obstruction?
  • Which Inferior Turbinate Reduction Technique Best Decreases Nasal Obstruction?
Explore This Issue
November 2007

Seth M. Pransky, MD, shares his perspective regarding the appropriate indications for surgical intervention for children with chronic sinusitis.

When a pediatric patient presents with a diagnosis of chronic sinusitis and rhinitis, my modus operandi is to assess the patient, review the history, and provide medical treatment as indicated. However, patients not responding to aggressive medical management treatments may require further evaluation, and some may be candidates for surgical intervention.

Assessment follows the “five A’s” (see Table 1) to identify the potential cause or causes of chronic sinusitis. Allergies should be identified, and avoided and/or treated with antihistamines and intranasal corticosteroid sprays. The adenoids should be evaluated for hypertrophy. This can contribute to rhinosinusitis through mechanical obstruction; and chronic adenoiditis may also be a source of recurrent bacterial infection.3 Acid reflux should also be evaluated as a potential cause. If the patient history is suggestive of GERD, then an empiric trial of anti-reflux medications (H2 blocker or proton-pump inhibitor) should be considered.4,5 Evaluation for other underlying medical disorders should also be performed.

Seth M. Pransky, MD

Seth M. Pransky, MD

The small subset of patients that does not respond to maximum medical therapy may be considered for surgical intervention. Usually the first step in medical management is to carry out an adenoidectomy. However, if symptoms persist after an adenoidectomy, inferior turbinate reduction should be considered. While still controversial, inferior turbinectomy has shown positive results in clinical studies.6–10 Indications for surgery include the persistence of symptoms of nasal obstruction—with or without nasal discharge—despite ongoing medical therapy and the absence of evidence suggesting an alternate diagnosis. A CT scan should be performed to detect evidence of respiratory infection and to help define anatomy. In my experience, turbinate anatomy affects only a small number of children with chronic sinusitis. Therefore, patients to be considered for turbinate reduction should be carefully selected.

Turbinate Reduction Procedure

In my practice, I currently use the coblation (or “cold ablation”) radiofrequency technique for turbinate reduction in children. The coblation probe is inserted into the anterior and medial portions of the inferior turbinate and one path is made with three “lesions” generated from posterior to anterior. Each lesion vaporizes tissue within 0.5 mm of the probe. For most children, the procedure is performed in the operating room under general anesthesia. Tissues immediately adjacent to the probe are heated to 40°C to 70°C. This lower-temperature technique allows for removal of target tissue without damage to collateral structures, thereby preserving anatomy and leaving facial growth unaffected. The procedure is quick, requiring about 15 minutes to perform. For most younger children (under 10 years of age), the procedure is performed in the operating room.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Head and Neck, Practice Management Issue: November 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Surgical Indications for Pediatric Turbinate Reduction: Arguments For and Against
  • A More Conservative Approach
  • Which Inferior Turbinate Reduction Technique Best Decreases Nasal Obstruction?
  • Which Inferior Turbinate Reduction Technique Best Decreases Nasal Obstruction?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939