• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Innovation and Intellectual Property in Otolaryngology

by Renée Bacher • May 16, 2023

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

“In general, these timelines have improved since our initial report, as a recent study by USC Biodesign has demonstrated,” he said. The USC Biodesign report (“Interstates and Autobahns: Global Medtech Innovation and Regulation in the Digital Age,” March 2022) found that the median time from concept to FDA decision for novel medical products was about 2½ years for 510(k) approvals and about 5½ years for De Novo approvals. The report also noted that the FDA has responded more effectively to advances in innovation than regulatory authorities in Europe.

You Might Also Like

  • The Need for Innovation in Otolaryngology
  • Letter from the Editor: Recent Feats of Innovation in Otolaryngology
  • How to Develop New Products, Ideas in Otolaryngology
  • Innovation in Cochlear Impant Surgery
Explore This Issue
May 2023

Business Basics

When it comes to bringing ideas to fruition, physician innovators must learn a lot along the way. Dr. Kozin advised that, given the complexity of surgical device development, clinician innovators should be comfortable in seeking outside expert support.

“We needed support to undertake market analyses and design business strategies,” he said. “To address this, we created a multidisciplinary commercialization team that included experts who had specific business expertise.”

Dr. Klein pointed out the importance of making sure that the team an inventor puts together is of the highest quality. “Once you identify really good people to partner with on good ideas, the next steps will come together much more easily.”

Once you identify really good people to partner with on good ideas, the next steps will come together much more easily. —Adam M. Klein, MD

What kind of money can a doctor make from these innovations? “There’s money to be made, but it’s not as easy as one would hope. It takes a lot of time, dedication, and hard work,” said Dr. Klein. “We’re supported in the academic sector by the resources of the university when it comes to patenting and early-stage market analysis, which takes the initial financial risk away from the inventors. In exchange, the university and the department each earn a piece of the financial pie.” In general, he added, drug innovation tends to be more lucrative than medical device innovation.

Dr. Kozin doesn’t believe that otolaryngologists should consider doing innovation work for financial incentives. “While the goal of any innovation work may be to bring a novel device to market and develop a commercially viable product, this process may take a decade or more of work and ultimately result in minimal personal financial reward,” he said. “Instead, the work should be done because the individual is passionate about the idea and impacting patient care.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Home Slider Tagged With: innovation, inventionIssue: May 2023

You Might Also Like:

  • The Need for Innovation in Otolaryngology
  • Letter from the Editor: Recent Feats of Innovation in Otolaryngology
  • How to Develop New Products, Ideas in Otolaryngology
  • Innovation in Cochlear Impant Surgery

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939