• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Integrating Preoperative Imaging, Intraoperative Findings in Maxillary Sinus Floor Infiltration Assessment in Patients with Maxillary Cancer

by Linda Kossoff • January 14, 2022

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

In cases of maxillary cancer, what are the challenges involved in the preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of maxillary sinus floor (MSF) infiltration, and what are their prognostic relevance?

BOTTOM LINE

You Might Also Like

  • How to: Nasoseptal Flap to Repair Large Maxillary Sinus Floor Defects
  • HN Cancer Patients with Negative Imaging History Derive Limited Benefit from Subsequent PET-CT
  • Preoperative Laryngoscopic Exam Critical to Detecting Vocal Cord Paralysis in Patients with Thyroid Cancer with Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Invasion
  • How To: Transseptal Approach to the Maxillary Sinus and Pterygopalatine Fossa
Explore This Issue
January 2022

Preoperative imaging should be integrated with intraoperative findings based on endoscopic inspection and frozen sections in patients with maxillary cancer.

BACKGROUND: Disappointing overall survival (OS) rates for maxillary sinus cancer are mainly due to diagnostic delay but are also reported for early-stage tumors. Such tumors may involve critical areas such as the MSF, requiring invasive transfacial resections. The prognostic impact of MSF involvement in maxillary sinus cancer has not been properly investigated, however.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series.

SETTING: Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria-Varese, ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo, Varese, Italy.

SYNOPSIS: Researchers conducted a retrospective review of 118 patients receiving surgical-based treatment for primary maxillary sinus cancers at a single institution between January 2000 and November 2019, with the intent of using the least invasive approach required to complete excision. The team obtained and reviewed all patients’ imaging studies to assess the presence of MSF involvement. They found that, comparing intraoperative findings (endoscopic assessment and frozen sections) with preoperative radiological assessment, diagnostic changes regarding MSF infiltration were found in 27.1% of cases. Of all patients, 78.8% were affected by tumors staged at least pT3, with MSF trespassing the bony boundaries of the maxillary sinus. Analysis showed that MSF infiltration was significantly associated with reduced rates of OS, disease-free survival, local recurrence-free survival, and distant recurrence-free survival, suggesting that MSF infiltration might independently negatively impact survival and local control rate. Authors state that future studies are required to investigate the opportunity to incorporate MSF infiltration in the Tumor Nodes Metastasis staging system. Limitations of this study included its retrospective nature and a simplified histological classification of tumors.

CITATION: Arosio AD, Turri-Zanoni M, Sileo G, et al. Maxillary sinus floor infiltration: Results from a series of 118 maxillary sinus cancers. Laryngoscope. 2022;132:26-35.

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Head and Neck, Literature Reviews Tagged With: clinical best practices, head and neck cancerIssue: January 2022

You Might Also Like:

  • How to: Nasoseptal Flap to Repair Large Maxillary Sinus Floor Defects
  • HN Cancer Patients with Negative Imaging History Derive Limited Benefit from Subsequent PET-CT
  • Preoperative Laryngoscopic Exam Critical to Detecting Vocal Cord Paralysis in Patients with Thyroid Cancer with Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Invasion
  • How To: Transseptal Approach to the Maxillary Sinus and Pterygopalatine Fossa

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • Top 10 LARY and LIO Articles of 2024
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939