• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

The 21st Century Cures Act

by Karen Appold • August 15, 2017

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
© James Steidl / shutterstock.com

© James Steidl / shutterstock.com

The 21st Century Cures Act, also known as the Cures Act, provides the National Institutes of Health (NIH) with critical tools and resources to advance biomedical research across the spectrum, from foundational basic research studies to advanced clinical trials of promising new therapies. Both the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate passed it with strong bipartisan support, and it became law on December 13, 2016.

You Might Also Like

  • Cures Act Information Blocking Rule: Steps to Take to Ensure Your Practice Is in Compliance
  • Head and Neck Surgery: Meeting the Needs of the 21st Century
  • Affordable Care Act Latest in Half-Century of Healthcare Reform
  • How Will the Affordable Care Act Impact Otolaryngology?
Explore This Issue
August 2017

The legislation provides $4.8 billion in funding to four highly innovative scientific initiatives over the next 10 years, including the All of Us Research Program, formerly known as the PMI Cohort Program ($1.45 billion), the Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) Initiative ($1.5 billion), Cancer Moonshot ($1.8 billion), and the Regenerative Medicine Innovation Project ($30 million) (See Table 1).

“Funding to the NIH has been one of the most critical drivers of improved health in the world,” said Joseph E. Kerschner, MD, professor of otolaryngology, microbiology, and immunology, dean of the School of Medicine, and executive vice president of the Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee. “Virtually every disorder that an otolaryngologist comes into contact with has been altered, with improved patient outcomes, because of NIH-funded research. Specifically, the Cures Act includes increased funding to the NIH for cancer research—including cancer of the head and neck—which has the tremendous potential to make significant progress toward improved care and survival rates. Other areas of emphasis include funding for research in opioid use, behavioral health, and access to healthcare, which are critical areas impacting otolaryngologists and their patients.”

Baldwin Wong, chief of the Science Policy and Planning Branch of the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) in Bethesda, Md., believes the act supports the NIDCD’s mission and will benefit the field of otolaryngology in many ways. The NIDCD is one of 27 NIH institutes and centers within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Here’s a closer look at each of the four initiatives.

Joseph E. Kerschner, MDFunding to the NIH has been one of the most critical drivers of improved health in the world. Virtually every disorder that an otolaryngologist comes into contact with has been altered, with improved patient outcomes because of NIH-funded research. —Joseph E. Kerschner, MD

All of Us Research Program

For this program, NIH will recruit one million or more adult volunteers in the United States to participate in a study to accelerate research for a wide range of diseases and improve the understanding of health. “Participants will provide information about their medical history and lifestyles on a questionnaire and may also be asked to provide physical measurements or donate a blood or urine sample,” Wong said. “Individuals with communication disorders could be part of this volunteer group, as the study aims to reach a cross-section of the country.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy Tagged With: 21st century cures act, biomedical research, national institutes of health, NIH, otolaryngologyIssue: August 2017

You Might Also Like:

  • Cures Act Information Blocking Rule: Steps to Take to Ensure Your Practice Is in Compliance
  • Head and Neck Surgery: Meeting the Needs of the 21st Century
  • Affordable Care Act Latest in Half-Century of Healthcare Reform
  • How Will the Affordable Care Act Impact Otolaryngology?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939